SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Reliability Inc (REAL)
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
542 11 0 REAL
Emcee:  warren harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
117 All: Sold the balance of holdings in REAL. No TA to back up this move, just GLWoodchuck-8/16/1997
116 What's interesting about today's market activity is that the big semi-eSteve Childs-8/15/1997
115 What is the relationship of PNDA and REAL. PNDA is having a good day, but I faiChristopher Brainard-8/15/1997
114 REAL's upside potential is limited. Take a look at PNDA!player-8/15/1997
113 Bob, thanks for your input. On the long term debt, I meant that they used 2.2 mSteve Childs-8/14/1997
112 Sorry I didn't respond to your comments earlier, was kind of confused by yoBob Richmann-8/14/1997
111 Steve, I hope you are right, though the stock seems to be having a little troubChristopher Brainard-8/14/1997
110 This is not to counter what you reported, Steve, but as I recall, the share repCody Goebel-8/13/1997
109 Thanks Chris. Well, regardless of what I said, I think there is a good chance tSteve Childs-8/13/1997
108 Steve, Read your balance sheet comments .... The company states in their 2nd quChristopher Brainard-8/13/1997
107 Did anyone read my balance sheet comments? They are at the end of the balance sSteve Childs-8/13/1997
106 Bought REAL at 35. Current quote: Bid 33, Ask 34. Last 33 3/4, - 3/8. Looks liPhilip H. Lee-8/13/1997
105 Todd, I agree with Bob's response to your question. But the more I thought Christopher Brainard-8/12/1997
104 The analyst may think the company is being overly conservative. The 60-70% estiBob Richmann-8/12/1997
103 Any thoughts on why current estimate for 1997 is $2.18 when the Company stated Todd Rozelle-8/12/1997
102 I'd be interested in hearing some comments about REAL's balance sheet. Steve Childs-8/11/1997
101 Hi Woodchuck, Welcome back. The new tax law requires you to hold stocks 18 monChristopher Brainard-8/11/1997
100 Chris, Just got back from a week away...lots of thread reading to catch up on. Woodchuck-8/9/1997
99 Woodchuck, Looks like the market has answered your question. I thought we mighChristopher Brainard-8/6/1997
98 Extremely attractive relative valuation. Just look around at what other playChristopher Brainard-8/5/1997
97 Yes, but what is it based on?Elmer Flugum-8/5/1997
96 Len, Do you find todays action "APPEALING" Chris .....Christopher Brainard-8/5/1997
95 fine, but remember there is only 1 analyst following the stock at zacks. I woulkiran-8/5/1997
94 Fine, then go buy one of the 'Big Boy' equipment makers selling at 20 tChristopher Brainard-8/5/1997
93 Zacks also estimated last quarter at .38 vs actual of .78, Zacks also rates as Todd Rozelle-8/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News