SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11709 and who might this "broker friend " work for?...LOL... Tim Luke-4/9/1999
11708 is that a "bloomberg" news release? MisFire Angle? steve susko-4/9/1999
11707 No idea...if the rumor is correct, I surely hope FORE comes up with another suiElmer Flugum-4/9/1999
11706 Cool - I rolled out of the May 10s with a very nice profit. And am now riding Art M-4/9/1999
11705 Broker of a friend, who lives and works in Pittsburgh, mentioned that she sell Elmer Flugum-4/9/1999
11704 <i>Rumor has it that FORE has rejected Ericsson's bid. </i> Ijas cooper-4/9/1999
11703 oh really!!..would like to back up that statement in public or retract it? Tim Luke-4/9/1999
11702 If Ericsson comes back for another shot, perhaps good news. Elmer Flugum-4/9/1999
11701 >>UNCONFIRMED ! Rumor has it that FORE has rejected Ericsson's Riskmgmt-4/9/1999
11700 Is this the good news or the bad news? (presuming one is long) Art M-4/9/1999
11699 <B>UNCONFIRMED !</B> Rumor has it that FORE has rejected Ericsson&Elmer Flugum-4/9/1999
11698 Whoa KE-mo-sabe, sorry, I found your speculation interesting and plausible, no P.F.-4/9/1999
11697 P.F. - What is that - sarcasm? I've been long on FORE and CSCO alot longer Trevor Goodchild-4/9/1999
11696 jach, I purchased BrowseMaster to take advantage of its "ignore" feadoormouse-4/9/1999
11695 another bargain (similar to FORE when FORE was at 13) Message 8797808jach-4/9/1999
11694 John, that's because I strip out one time charges, and they don't. Am IChuzzlewit-4/9/1999
11693 Trevor--it certainly is lucky we have you here to point out how wrong everyone P.F.-4/9/1999
11692 Yahoo's version of FORE's management effectiveness: biz.yahoo.com Manjohn dodson-4/8/1999
11691 Your screening method is biased. This past year wasn't a stellar year for Trevor Goodchild-4/8/1999
11690 <i>...if I were buying such a company I would want to give the existing jas cooper-4/8/1999
11689 I agree. No real synergy between FORE and CSCO. Then again, some acquisitions Trevor Goodchild-4/8/1999
11688 Edwarda, generally in tech mergers the acquirer takes the whole shooting match Chuzzlewit-4/8/1999
11687 Chuzz...now get back to the DELL board where you belong and stop these cat figMurrey Walker-4/8/1999
11686 Or want to. Purring.... LOL! Your points about the attractiveness of the manEdwarda-4/8/1999
11685 Absolutely. And as is well known pussycats never lie. Except when they have toChuzzlewit-4/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News