SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc
An SI Board Since August 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2396 17 0 ACII
Emcee:  BarclayDonaldson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1171That's what I mean, there no terms of the financing. They love leaving us infloyd2518-2/11/2008
1170Benchman, look at my last post the link has more detail if nothing was changed, floyd2518-2/11/2008
1169I keep an eye on this one. I think the problem here is that there were no detaiBenchman-2/11/2008
1168Maybe its something that is reviewed annually, at least if this is the case theyMachinehead-2/11/2008
1167Did they forget that this was one of their crap news releases put out already? Hfloyd2518-2/11/2008
1166I care. Just averaged down. At least Tip Capital believes in them. Should staFindit-2/11/2008
1165It seems nobody cares! More false hopes.floyd2518-2/11/2008
1164AmeriChip International, Inc. to Finance Growth With $125 Million 2008-02-11 13Pascal06-2/11/2008
1163Since they PR'd that they were "preparing" for production with twowso2-2/11/2008
1162floyd: I don't think Gaskins has been around for three years, although I wilBarclayDonaldson-2/11/2008
1161BD, fair enough, but I for one do not believe much of what they say. They, thru floyd2518-2/11/2008
1160floyd: yes, they have said that. As I posted previously, here's IR's reBarclayDonaldson-2/10/2008
1159They have never said that it was to prevent a takeover, these are just assumptiofloyd2518-2/10/2008
1158Excellent point Barclay. These guys have talked and acted like they were worrierushlong-2/10/2008
1157rush: Would be nice, if that's the case. If you remember early last year, tBarclayDonaldson-2/10/2008
1156Barclay, Thanks! That's what I thought was happening. Voting rights to prophoenixrising1-2/9/2008
1155that's the way I see it. let's hope they announce some details when thwso2-2/9/2008
1154Positive Spin (but also most probable) The stated purpose for these preferred irushlong-2/8/2008
1153phoenix: The only worth I see is that it gives them control over anything the shBarclayDonaldson-2/8/2008
1152I didn't see the "voting rights" thing. Just woke up from my nap. rhoshariasha-2/8/2008
11511,000 X 255,000 = 255,000,000 Shane this figure is in terms of additional votingrushlong-2/8/2008
1150Barclay, don't you mean 255,000? I can't find 255 million, but I can finrhoshariasha-2/8/2008
1149BarclayDonaldson: Thx for IR follow up. bounbtbboundtb-2/8/2008
1148Barclay, Can you cut thru the SEC filings gibberish and decipher just what thesphoenixrising1-2/8/2008
1147Too many shares outstanding and too much overhead selling on this pig.tevet-2/8/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News