SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
India Coffee House
An SI Board Since March 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
12475 46 0
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11750Was Partition a historic blunder? Rafiq Zakaria [The author is an Islamic schoNick-1/17/2002
11749<b>The Lice people</b> The officer in charge of the detainees says: JPR-1/17/2002
11748<b>The Louse wants to grow a beard The evil doers were sheared from head tJPR-1/16/2002
11747<b>Jinnah's Pakistan looks more like a plucked peacock Pakistan's JPR-1/16/2002
11746Hi Ratan: I remember the hindi-chini bhai bhai mantra. Bye-Bye. Nehru's ideJPR-1/15/2002
11745Message 16910336Nick-1/15/2002
11744<i>Rongji won't be visiting India had he any military intentions in suratan lal-1/15/2002
11743<i>Hopefully the Americans, Israelies and Indians will get together and tasea_biscuit-1/14/2002
11742<There is no proof that the Taliban has nuclear capability. It is Pakistan thbaystock-1/14/2002
11741<i>Except it won't be very easy for your Taliban friends to launch nucsea_biscuit-1/14/2002
11740<You are a total idiot> I couldn't care less what you think, dipsh*t. baystock-1/13/2002
11739<b>Rongji right on terrorism - off to India</b> Rongji is right on JPR-1/13/2002
11738You are a total idiot. Just because I said something against your RSS, you in sea_biscuit-1/13/2002
11737<What "conspicuous silence"? > Yours. You rant and rave about Rbaystock-1/12/2002
11736<b>Musharaff, my man - says US</b> Hi: Indians will not divulge any JPR-1/12/2002
11735<i>Hopefully India won't be fullish enough to present this evidence tosea_biscuit-1/12/2002
11734What "conspicuous silence"? The Taliban, the Mujahideen et al are thesea_biscuit-1/12/2002
11733<I suspect, brought all the evidence necessary to indict Musharaff , ISI, LETbaystock-1/12/2002
11732<What do you mean by "your Taliban"? > You are either for terrobaystock-1/12/2002
11731<b>Follow the script to the letter, general. No ad lib</b> The scripJPR-1/11/2002
11730<b>paki's goose is getting cooked</b> Advani , I suspect, broughJPR-1/10/2002
11729What do you mean by "your Taliban"? All I said was that contrary to wsea_biscuit-1/10/2002
11728I think you are confused. It is your Taliban and Osama terrorist cohorts that arbaystock-1/10/2002
11727<i>Musharaf cannot personally afford even a very limited defeat in a real sea_biscuit-1/10/2002
11726<I>You can rest assured that the provocation will always fall short of beiNandu-1/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):