FORE Inc. | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
12559	26	0	FORE

Emcee: Pascal A. Mons	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
11759	<i>i.e. they don't want to be thrown out after the merger, or they w	jas cooper	-	4/9/1999
11758	are you ever at a loss for words?..LOL	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11757	<i> excuse me but don't you think we have enough bullshit to weed thr	jas cooper	-	4/9/1999
11756	Todays late weakness was the result of daytraders unwinding not holding thru we	thebeach	-	4/9/1999
11755	well i hope you guys got your shares on the dip because right after the F-ING U	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11754	Add another scenario, as long as we're talking hypotheticals: D) Mgt knows	john dodson	-	4/9/1999
11753	Hey len, Thanks, ya heard it, ya passed it along, ya called it a rumor and said	P.F.	-	4/9/1999
11752	excuse me but don't you think we have enough bullshit to weed through then	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11751	It's interesting how so many react so strongly to a rumor that was clearly	john dodson	-	4/9/1999
11750	asnd..gone xyln..gone fore..the best networker left on the open market...IMO	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11749	Let's assume the rumor is fact...just for the sake of it. Scenario's:	Jeff Lins	-	4/9/1999
11748	No negatives would be: 1) Sewage Treatment Plant Worker 2) Lives in Flushing,	JakeStraw	-	4/9/1999
11747	j garcia - you just proved his point. Negatives 1. Broker 2. Lives in Greenwi	Art M	-	4/9/1999
11746	>>Odds are that if broker source was any good they wouldn't be wastin	JakeStraw	-	4/9/1999
11745	I'm busting a gut laughing. Why waste time posting rumors from a broker! O	Morris Catt	-	4/9/1999
11744	like Sly told me once ..DTA	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11743	I know, I know, but you got to admit that a rumor is a rumor.....	JakeStraw	-	4/9/1999
11742	it's one thing when you here about buyout rumors on fore in the press and o	Tim Luke	-	4/9/1999
11741	len, kind of ironic that you get lambasted for posting that the acquisition mig	JakeStraw	-	4/9/1999
11740	<i>Now where did you get that info, don't tell me, from your broker!	jas cooper	-	4/9/1999
11739	As I stated, rumor could be positive or negative...lots of details missing..	Elmer Flugum	-	4/9/1999
11738	I meant in a situation like Fore's, if one puts out a rumor one needs to b	G.F.	-	4/9/1999
11737	I don't think FORE would put out a rumor...maybe a leak, maybe not.. I sho	Elmer Flugum	-	4/9/1999
11736	I just don't see that as a negitive right now, if they did turn them down.	jimbos	-	4/9/1999
11735	<i>I heard that FORE walked away from $42 not long ago. I don't think	Riskmgmt	-	4/9/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):