SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XO Communications (XOXO)
An SI Board Since September 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1018 22 0 XOXO
Emcee:  SecularBull Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
118<i>Sentiment still not good on CLEC's. </i> You buy them when tJF Quinnelly-5/31/2001
117I agree... not sure here... moneyflow terrible... stock dropping.... wonder whatsam_o-5/31/2001
116I'm adding. Either this company is going out of business or it is not. ~SBSecularBull-5/31/2001
115Not sure it's safe yet. Sentiment still not good on CLEC's. Keeping 1K fSoftechie-5/31/2001
114time to go long? especially in light of merrill's lame-o downgrade? sittinStormRider-5/31/2001
113Let's hope someone asks Dan and Nate about their new options in the wake of miamigator-5/25/2001
112Annual meeting. Wednesday 5/30 9am.Softechie-5/25/2001
111Certainly a possibility. Thanks for the update. ~SB~SecularBull-5/25/2001
110Short interest increased 33% between 4/13-5/15 to 18,968,944 from 14,177,762 andSoftechie-5/24/2001
109Re: Insiders-- biz.yahoo.com ~SB~SecularBull-5/23/2001
108I actually think XOXO is the riskier of the 3 when you look at the income and baRobert Scott-5/23/2001
107I can't speak to the others, but I agree on XOXO. ~SB~SecularBull-5/22/2001
106Picked up some shares this AM. Also ALGX and MCLD. Unless the Telecom Act is rRobert Scott-5/22/2001
105FCC says local phone lines served by rivals doubled May 21, 2001 5:36:00 PM ET Joseph Strohsahl-5/21/2001
104*DJ Distressed Telecom Bonds Tough For `Vultures' To Value 21 May 11:36 Softechie-5/21/2001
103The reason Thompson shows a lower % of today's retail buying than for the moArnie Doolittle-5/18/2001
102iw.thomsonfn.comSecularBull-5/18/2001
101VZ - a must read: yahoo.smartmoney.comArnie Doolittle-5/18/2001
100I don't know. I didn't buy it for a quick hit and, as I'm sure you Arnie Doolittle-5/17/2001
99So when this survivor will shine? What's your speculation for this company aSoftechie-5/17/2001
98Well in any case, no matter how it turns out (a takeover or no takeover), I stilvoyagers_stocktips-5/17/2001
97The difference between the others who said "pound salt" and Craig McCaArnie Doolittle-5/17/2001
96Yes, but a few years ago, the Market as a whole, and the Telecom world in generavoyagers_stocktips-5/17/2001
95My point exactly. It's not like XO doesn't have something to offer the voyagers_stocktips-5/17/2001
94Forstmann Little's conversion price is $17 which translates to a $6.3B markeArnie Doolittle-5/17/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News