SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Winstar Comm. (WCII)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12468 35 0 WCIIQ
Emcee:  MARK JALBERT Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11818 SSB's Grubman ups WCII target to $100 from $86 and maintains BUY rating.gruetz-2/11/2000
11817 Presumably because the target price was reached. Who's the Jeffries analystsilicon warrior-2/11/2000
11816 There was a downgrade by Jefferies to accumulate. I don't have the rationaLane3-2/11/2000
11815 Shoulda known; buy the rumor, sell the news......silicon warrior-2/11/2000
11814 Merrill put an intermediate and long term buy on NXLK. silicon warrior-2/11/2000
11813 Is this the first positive headline we have seen after an earnings report? FirsDubM-2/10/2000
11812 I'm crying all the way to the bank on WCII's report. Regards to all, SecularBull-2/10/2000
11811 If you don't mind, what did they say about NXLK? Couldn't find that...SecularBull-2/10/2000
11810 sw - This announcement is simply beyond all expectations at this stage and selimtex-2/10/2000
11809 Looks awfully good. She may really come into her own this year. If so, we can esilicon warrior-2/10/2000
11808 AR - Oh dear! I was totally wrong. I have a few minutes left so I'm goinglimtex-2/10/2000
11807 Take a look here: siliconinvestor.comAlvin J. Rakowski-2/10/2000
11806 GB - My Guess:- Steady and good progress in lines, customers and revenues. limtex-2/10/2000
11805 As Steve G predicted, Merrill intiated coverage on WCII, TGNT and NXLK. WCII issilicon warrior-2/10/2000
11804 L, Deathly silence on the board. Any takes on what will be presented later todgabor boda-2/10/2000
11803 Maybe "the street" knew that it was a mistake all along. As far as tTheSlowLane-2/9/2000
11802 I mentioned Vogel. He said 96 back in what, 97, prior to the big runup into thesilicon warrior-2/8/2000
11801 Hey L: I couldn't make out the....cut...losses and the increase to 15 or whAlejandro-2/8/2000
11800 SW - Holy smoke SW I saw the word <I>correction</I> in your post limtex-2/8/2000
11799 SW, that's good news. Saw the following article from Bloomberg: Winstar SeDubM-2/8/2000
11798 OK. Thanks. LoFSecularBull-2/8/2000
11797 As I understand it, from minus 15.1 to minus 13.1............silicon warrior-2/8/2000
11796 Can you elaborate? Is it cut to ($11.10)? Thanks. LoFSecularBull-2/8/2000
11795 FLASH;REUTERS WAS WRONG! GOLDMAN CUT 2000 LOSSES by $2; not increased. Correctisilicon warrior-2/8/2000
11794 Well, can you imagine 84 dollars a share?? Long way from Oct. 98. Vogel's osilicon warrior-2/8/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):