SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1593003 524 0
Emcee:  Duncan Baird Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
118457 Heh, sorry about pre-announcing that, Hans. <eom>dougSF30-6/29/2000
118456 Re: "Actually, I would say it's in Intel's best interest to stay pElmer-6/29/2000
118455 Mustang to start with 1.3GHz at 180 nm... Can AMD's circuit designers perfHans de Vries-6/29/2000
118454 Thread, from Hans on the Yahoo board (Mustang musings) messages.yahoo.com ---dougSF30-6/29/2000
118453 Re: <i>Perhaps the press release was bait for Jerry</i> Ratbert, chic_hearne-6/29/2000
118452 Chic, they listed the reseller(s) that they spoke to by phone-- I guess you coudougSF30-6/29/2000
118451 Elmer, <When the false accusations stop, I'll stop.> It is easy to rAli Chen-6/29/2000
118450 <i>The number for Intel is significantly higher than 10,000. </i> EricRR-6/29/2000
118449 Re:"Brilliant move by Intel!" LOL Sure Elmer, sure. eom ajbrenner-6/29/2000
118448 <i>There is a very good reason. Now everyone knows Intel's intentionsEricRR-6/29/2000
118447 What is funny about Intel's claim to being a technology leader is that it iMani1-6/29/2000
118446 Re: "Can you give us a correct order of magnitude?" The number for IElmer-6/29/2000
118445 Hello Ratbert, Re: <i>After all, this comes right after the P4 "anocrazyoldman-6/29/2000
118444 <i>This information is incorrect. </i> Can you give us a correct oEricRR-6/29/2000
118443 Re: <i>From the Yahoo thread-- KT-133 mobos coming in volume</i> Dchic_hearne-6/29/2000
118442 Re: "This press release needs more analysis then we have given it. What poElmer-6/29/2000
118441 Ratbert re <<What possible benefits would intel get from the anouncement Mani1-6/29/2000
118440 Hello ajb, Re: <i>Not a chance. With a CNBC story like that and the prevcrazyoldman-6/29/2000
118439 <i>According to a spokesman for the Santa Clara, Calif., chip firm, the aEricRR-6/29/2000
118438 Re: "Guys, this is starting to sound like junior high school" Yes itElmer-6/29/2000
118437 From the Yahoo thread-- KT-133 mobos coming in volume Resellers are apparentlydougSF30-6/29/2000
118436 Re: "I pointed out that making an announcement about an announcement is prElmer-6/29/2000
118435 Re:"Hope with more good reports like this we're not headed down again ajbrenner-6/29/2000
118434 Hello Nick, Re: <i>Very positive report about AMD on CNBC By Jerry Castecrazyoldman-6/29/2000
118433 Guys, this is starting to sound like junior high school. Could this whole lidougSF30-6/29/2000
118432 Gateway supply: On corp. page: 667MHz = 733MHz + $50 (50) = 800MHz +EricRR-6/29/2000
118431 Re: "Elmer, maybe it's just me but your jests sound, taste, and feel jElmer-6/29/2000
118430 Tench, see dailynews.yahoo.com excerpt: However, analysts said that AMD is cudougSF30-6/29/2000
118429 Petz, <considering that 3 months after the last announcement of the 1 GHz PeTenchusatsu-6/29/2000
118428 Very positive report about AMD on CNBC By Jerry Castellini. He spoke about &qunixtox-6/29/2000
118427 doug<i>but I'm surprised you're hearing information that much difEricRR-6/29/2000
118426 Dell supply: One can extract some interesting info from the Dell web page: (cEricRR-6/29/2000
118425 Elmer Re..<<<<<<b>I can see you are one of the sub 50 hmaly-6/29/2000
118424 doug, thanks for your due diligence on the Kanellos article. I also sent him anPetz-6/29/2000
118423 Hachman's spin on the 1.13 release <b>Intel To Debut 1.13-GHz Pentiusurvivin-6/29/2000
118422 And my final reply to CNet The Intellibees are going to be all over me for thidougSF30-6/29/2000
118421 CNet Replies! Not sure what I can say to his reply #2... CNet to me #2: i&#dougSF30-6/29/2000
118420 <i>I can see you are one of the sub 50 IQ group who can't tell a jestbrushwud-6/29/2000
118419 Re: "Read my lips, loser:" I can see you are one of the sub 50 IQ grElmer-6/29/2000
118418 More bogus news-- excerpt from the cnet article: <i>The heated race, howdougSF30-6/29/2000
118417 SI's and Thomson RTQ both say 76, last size 100, bid 76 ask 76.5. Call optPetz-6/29/2000
118416 I get 76 A/H at freerealtime.com DougdougSF30-6/29/2000
118415 <i>I know you are too much of a coward to back up your accusations and yobrushwud-6/29/2000
118414 Afterhours says 80 1/2 Symbol Last Change Day Close Bid Ask Time AMD.E 80 1/milo_morai-6/29/2000
118413 milo, <Supers are blocks of 10k or higher and are usually negotiated sales. Petz-6/29/2000
118412 Re: "It takes one to know one, I guess" I know you are too much of aElmer-6/29/2000
118411 It's been fairly clear (anandtech, etc) that 1.1 GHz was heading our way vedougSF30-6/29/2000
118410 re: "Two banner news days in a row" Doug I'm not sure if this arsurvivin-6/29/2000
118409 RE: <some people use it as a contrarian indicator.> Ted, Thomsons is wiEpinephrine-6/29/2000
118408 re:"some people use [Thomson IWatch] as a contrarian indicator." AboPetz-6/29/2000
118407 Muzosi - RE: "Intel to release 1.13GHz PIII on July 31st. When will AMD reCirruslvr-6/29/2000
118406 Intel to release 1.13GHz PIII on July 31st. When will AMD respond ? cnetinvestmuzosi-6/29/2000
118405 Supers are blocks of 10k or higher and are usually negotiated sales. I don'milo_morai-6/29/2000
118404 More "limited releases" coming from Intel 1.13GHz coming at the END Cirruslvr-6/29/2000
118403 <i>...they [the Register] do have some good info but too many fabricated brushwud-6/29/2000
118402 Robert Thanks. tedtejek-6/29/2000
118401 Two banner news days in a row: Yesterday, Cliff "I have no brain" EddougSF30-6/29/2000
118400 <i>Ted just remember that is buy interest, doesn't mean the trade haptejek-6/29/2000
118399 <i>Re: Long weekend. The market is open Monday, though not a full day.<tejek-6/29/2000
118398 <i>I do to. I just know I would feel a lot worse then I already do if we tejek-6/29/2000
118397 Ted it's a smaller time sample.milo_morai-6/29/2000
118396 Ted just remember that is buy interest, doesn't mean the trade happened.milo_morai-6/29/2000
118395 Milo What did you do....use whiteout?!! <g> <i>-watch 5 min charttejek-6/29/2000
118394 Re: Long weekend. The market is open Monday, though not a full day. DougdougSF30-6/29/2000
118393 Re:"I hope you are right." Ted, I do to. I just know I would feel aajbrenner-6/29/2000
118392 I-watch 5 min chart looks better than 20 min chart thomsoninvest.netmilo_morai-6/29/2000
118391 <i>Ted, re: Compaq and "Inventory buildup at the retail level" tejek-6/29/2000
118390 I saw it on other thread but CPQ down 20% on 40+Million is bad.milo_morai-6/29/2000
118389 ajb and thread Just announced ......excellent news...do I hear rally tomorrowtejek-6/29/2000
118388 Ted, re: Compaq and "Inventory buildup at the retail level" One wordTenchusatsu-6/29/2000
118387 <i>Inventory buildup at the retail level.</i> HOUSTON, June 29 /PRFJB-6/29/2000
118386 <i>But those who are buying 10k blocks are not numbered among those who utejek-6/29/2000
118385 Re:"Inventory buildup at the retail level." Maybe it's all thoseajbrenner-6/29/2000
118384 <i>Meaning-- just because *their* inventory is building up doesn't metejek-6/29/2000
118383 Re: "some people use it as a contrarian indicator." Ted, But those ajbrenner-6/29/2000
118382 Isn't it possible that CPQ is just suffering at the hands of competitors? (dougSF30-6/29/2000
118381 <i>From Cramer, its upbeat...a change of pace from the down day.</I>tejek-6/29/2000
118380 <I>The the way I understand it is that I-Watch tracks trade of 10k or gretejek-6/29/2000
118379 <i>Was going to pick up more AMD this morning on AMD's weakness, but brushwud-6/29/2000
118378 <i>What was the CPQ news? They're going to miss?</I> Petz, Intejek-6/29/2000
118377 Petz <There was definitely heavy heavy buying at 75. More than half a millio5dave22-6/29/2000
118376 Remember Ted and Thread that is Pre trade interest.milo_morai-6/29/2000
118375 Re:I-Watch Doug, The the way I understand it is that I-Watch tracks trade of ajbrenner-6/29/2000
118374 There was definitely heavy heavy buying at 75. More than half a million shares Petz-6/29/2000
118373 I just went in BIG TIME on margin. I have a sell stop at $72. Anything below 5dave22-6/29/2000
118372 Chart explained.. Right now 75% Institutional activity Large Arrows are Super milo_morai-6/29/2000
118371 Big Buy Arrow show large blocks usually BIG moneymilo_morai-6/29/2000
118370 <i>Overall, there's 12 institutional buy indicators and only 2 sells.tejek-6/29/2000
118369 milo, how do I interpret the I-Watch chart?: thomsoninvest.net At 9:10 and 9:3Petz-6/29/2000
118368 <i>I guess we are down on the Bad CPQ news.(eom)</I> Milo Thattejek-6/29/2000
118367 Can you explain what that graph means? Obviously buyers = sellers?EricRR-6/29/2000
118366 So what do we make of that I-Watch chart? I've never understood what the hdougSF30-6/29/2000
118365 Marco Polo????? First alBeRT, then Yousef and now you!!! Can Stockman and FucElmer-6/29/2000
118364 <i>The sellers are wrong, but it doesn't matter what I know, it mattetejek-6/29/2000
118363 WOW look at this info!Thomson I-Watch Pre-Trade Institutional Activity thomsonmilo_morai-6/29/2000
118362 <i>The SOX is getting killed again today. 15/16 in the red, only MU posittejek-6/29/2000
118361 If there were ever a time to preannounce an upside surprise, tomorrow morning wdougSF30-6/29/2000
118360 Profit warnings spook tech investors Brown Bag Lunch June 29, 2000 by Thomas Comilo_morai-6/29/2000
118359 Milo, yeah the 2:30 downgrade of CPQ blew the rally apart... AMD and the generadougSF30-6/29/2000
118358 Doug CPQ getting hammered -4 on 28Mil. I think they are dragging AMD down.milo_morai-6/29/2000
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):