SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ATC Communications ATCT
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2636 4 0 ATCT
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1186 I got a call from my broker this morning telling me to buy ATCT because it was Rob Bonner-4/16/1997
1185 Wierd??!! What a load of C**P! Is there someone out here buying based on thatTimir-4/16/1997
1184 You wrote: >How well? MacroWorld's 1996 return, he says, was 41.9%,Ricardo Bekin-4/16/1997
1183 What if beans have a negative correlation factor ;)Rodger Wenzel-4/16/1997
1182 Gooooo!!! Soybean prices! This is so weirdRobert Gordon-4/16/1997
1181 I hope this article is right. I was too tempted to sell it at 6.25 but now willPradeep Tapadiya-4/16/1997
1180 It looks like another leak from the company!! But this time sounds good.....:)Sunny Span-4/16/1997
1179 To All, The following article might explain todays move. From Barrons ATCT newsBob Myers-4/16/1997
1178 Look out people. Don't increase your holdings just yet. This is probably Andre Daedone-4/16/1997
1177 Yes, it's been a fun morning! I've made back about half of my considerTony C.-4/16/1997
1176 It's sad, but I can't believe how excited I get seeing 6's these daFrancis Chang-4/16/1997
1175 > I could not find any news either. But the chart looks great. I'm not Randy Tidd-4/16/1997
1174 I could not find any news either. But the chart looks great. CJCJ Mark-4/16/1997
1173 ATCT up by almost a point. Any news? Pradeep Pradeep Tapadiya-4/16/1997
1172 Good point Bob....I never understood that either. Why would AT&T have a prTimir-4/16/1997
1171 Well, if you bought at 11 and sold at 7 3/8, I'd say you weren't too acGreg h2o-4/16/1997
1170 To All, I agree that this issue (web page) is of no great significance. HoweverBob Myers-4/16/1997
1169 Cherl and All: I might add this is the first step of developing a web page, is Ron Morse-4/16/1997
1168 Cherl: [ ATC Website] My guess is that ATC wanted to get a URL that had somethiRon Morse-4/16/1997
1167 Ed ---I hope you're not wistling into the wind. I have too much riding on yCheryl Galt-4/15/1997
1166 Web joke..... I have a nasty dent in the wall now and a sore head, resultant oEdgar Ethelridge-4/15/1997
1165 The URL is no joke. If you go to the NASDAQ homepage, the ticker is linked to Sam-4/15/1997
1164 I wish it were a joke. A home page doesn't take a genius or a huge investmeZencone-4/15/1997
1163 OK Sheena....What is FUD? Does Bond have something to do with this? ;-) TimiTimir-4/15/1997
1162 Baruch, RE atccom.com --- This IS a joke ....Right? This is a trick you didCheryl Galt-4/15/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News