SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1188 Respond again when you take the time to read Fleck. He has been around for neaDavid W. Taylor-6/11/2000
1187 Several posts ago, you stated that the ONLY productivity (and therefore disinMeDroogies-6/11/2000
1186 I believe in the contrarian view...when the timing for it is right. The timiMeDroogies-6/11/2000
1185 Actually, that's not true unless the stock market is completely routed and MeDroogies-6/11/2000
1184 Hasan, Thank you for a good, reasoned and unemotional post. Your thesis is a David W. Taylor-6/11/2000
1183 I seldom post, but Fleck is wrong and allow me to list reasons why. When you thasan syed-6/11/2000
1182 I do need to ask one other thing. Has anyone on the thread actually read any oDavid W. Taylor-6/10/2000
1181 >> you've wedded yourself to a theory that, when it's wrong, willDavid W. Taylor-6/10/2000
1180 Sure...whatever...you must know something millions of others are missing out MeDroogies-6/10/2000
1179 >> If they're wrong, then we've been in an overly inflationary enDavid W. Taylor-6/10/2000
1178 Well, then it's been that way for a while...so at least it's consisteMeDroogies-6/10/2000
1177 >> Producer Prices held at 0.0% - expected to be at 0.2%. Inflation remaiDavid W. Taylor-6/10/2000
1176 David, I've come to expect you to respond with a little more substance thanThe Ox-6/9/2000
1175 Yup...when he can't provide statistics (which are, oddly, useful), he'MeDroogies-6/9/2000
1174 "Did it ever occur to anyone else here that there are "lie, damned liLou D-6/9/2000
1173 No sour grapes David, just a casual reminder for the group......I'll give yLou Weed-6/8/2000
1172 Who's condescending now, Michael? Why the sour grapes? The little man on David W. Taylor-6/8/2000
1171 <<Did it ever occur to anyone else here that there are "lie, damned Lou Weed-6/8/2000
1170 >> The outlook for semiconductor capital spending continues to improve. 2David W. Taylor-6/8/2000
1169 I guess there's just too much double counting going on in the semi businessThe Ox-6/8/2000
1168 He does, of course, say if. If is important. By most measures, this is a mMeDroogies-6/8/2000
1167 David, Get a grip? It is you that appears to be losing it. CNXT is likely to Techplayer-6/8/2000
1166 >> So you don't want to trump out the facts? >> Scream!!!! TheDavid W. Taylor-6/8/2000
1165 From Fleck's column yesterday: "The expectation is that we are going David W. Taylor-6/7/2000
1164 David, So you don't want to trump out the facts? Please. give me a break.Techplayer-6/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):