SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
MILLIONAIRE. COM........( MLRE )
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2664 18 0 MLRE
Emcee:  Keiko Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1189 Why dont you go to there thread and talk about it Mr.Ignorence interesting man-1/5/1999
1188 Hey you guys, look at QNET. Does that look like a good short or what? blokker-1/5/1999
1187 Do you know what the restrictions are? Technically MLRE is not a new company...CoffeePot-1/5/1999
1186 Bear, 843-686-4598 is the office number S. Samblis-1/5/1999
1185 yes, please report yourself. You have clearly violated the terms of use. SBear Down-1/5/1999
1184 Spare us all the tattling would you. Your hero won't answer one question punetzon-1/5/1999
1183 APovolovixopizitozich, why dont you go back to school you idiot. blokker-1/5/1999
1182 Oh I forgot I just reported you too blokker to SI terms of agreement. Anyone elinteresting man-1/5/1999
1181 Tell him to get on this board and answer the damn questions!!!! netzon-1/5/1999
1180 If the shares are not restricted then the insiders could have already made millnetzon-1/5/1999
1179 Samblis is on the pone with me right now... Begging me to STOP this slamming. blokker-1/5/1999
1178 yes, they are "restricted". But the owners of these "restricted Kimberly Lee-1/5/1999
1177 Not much chance of our having to lunch on plastic I would say. netzon-1/5/1999
1176 funny post, I'll help you eat the other half of the keyboard. blokker-1/5/1999
1175 Regarding MLRE's reverse merger as opposed to a more traditional IPO, doesCoffeePot-1/5/1999
1174 You are right about the forward looking statements from BB's. In this case netzon-1/5/1999
1173 what will the next release say ? Steve Samblis AND MLRE Anticipate a letter of blokker-1/5/1999
1172 First off, alot of bb's get away wwith forward looking releases that neverBear Down-1/5/1999
1171 The way these guys are getting hammered on the boards now they better clear somnetzon-1/5/1999
1170 Not in this case. They are on the hook for the Kruse announcement. It was an ofnetzon-1/5/1999
1169 Probably because some guy announced it "meaning well" but was probablblokker-1/5/1999
1168 If we get an answer to these questions I'll eat my keyboard!! netzon-1/5/1999
1167 Lets see, what does a scum bag do with restricted stock? Well, for starters he blokker-1/5/1999
1166 Thank You!!! THat is what I 've been trying to say all along. There has Bear Down-1/5/1999
1165 Steve, why doesn't Kruse mention their deal with MLRE in the news releases netzon-1/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News