SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Internet Analysis - Discussion
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
419 14 0
Emcee:  musea Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
119 What AOL is touting at the moment: remember: Reverse the revenue streams!! suMaryinRed-2/4/1999
118 Yeah, I think you're right. The only way they could have considered themselJoe E.-2/4/1999
117 yup...the thread is "getting it" AOL has achieved......"liftofMaryinRed-2/3/1999
116 It was just some things I stumbled across. Glad I could contribute to the threaVendit™-2/3/1999
115 Well...you certainly confirmed what I have been thinking all along!! ExcellenMaryinRed-2/3/1999
114 Here is another link to an article about AOL and a $500M pact with First USA. musea-2/3/1999
113 This is some information I had book marked when I was doing my initial researchVendit™-2/3/1999
112 Joe, they used the purchase method of accounting, and so that $26MM is a non caChuzzlewit-2/3/1999
111 Amazon shows $26 million in merger expenses for the nine months, which look likJoe E.-2/3/1999
110 CTC, You can get all the volatility information you need at the Chicago Board OSteve Robinett-2/3/1999
109 JHG et al., here's my quickie cash flow analysis of Amazon. Data from EdgChuzzlewit-2/3/1999
108 Steve, you said <i>if you're thinking of some kind of ratio of generaChuzzlewit-2/3/1999
107 thanks.... My broker is Morgan Stanley dean Witter (her firm)... Since I have MaryinRed-2/3/1999
106 Thread, here are some links to Mary (Queen of the Net)Meeker's analyses. msjhg_in_kc-2/3/1999
105 CTC, You ask, <i>Are such volatilities available for the S&P500 as weSteve Robinett-2/3/1999
104 Steve, I will play with this idea of yours. <i>So, if one were to use volChuzzlewit-2/3/1999
103 Remember when AOl could not handle all the new subscribers...and the added timeMaryinRed-2/3/1999
102 CTC, A couple of comments on volatility and a suggestion. You point out, <i&Steve Robinett-2/3/1999
101 Re: <The initial cost…is the infrastructure…..that was killing AOL profit wijhg_in_kc-2/3/1999
100 Some comparisons of the brokerages based on fridays numbers: M CAHILL-2/3/1999
99 Here's an article from the Globe and Mail of January 28, 1999, which may beM CAHILL-2/3/1999
98 Steve, the idea is to generate a risk number relative to the broad-based marketChuzzlewit-2/3/1999
97 <i>Why use beta? Use volatility. Beta measures the stock's movement rReginald Middleton-2/2/1999
96tscn.com try that ...MaryinRed-2/2/1999
95 CTC, You comment, <i>With regard to CNPEG2, I too am uncomfortable with Steve Robinett-2/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News