SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NeoMedia Technologies (Bears Board)
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
194 4 0 NEOM
Emcee:  brewskih Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
119NEOM NEOM What am I going to do? I have lost my investment, and am feeling mighbrewskih-1/23/2008
118One Neom investor, keeps asking when management made the statement that "Nebrewskih-1/23/2008
117Its also interesting to see the same group of posters, continually attack Scanbubrewskih-1/23/2008
116You have to love it when you see some of the old top level pumpers of NEOM, resubrewskih-1/23/2008
115It is quite funny how some attempt to put dots out there for connecting, and makbrewskih-1/23/2008
114There are some, who stated since late 2006, that NEOM was in very dire straits fbrewskih-1/22/2008
113And more importantly, will Neom, by that time be able to acquire the necessary fbrewskih-1/22/2008
112With Scanbuy leading the front on 2D bar codes and Neom about broke, makes one wbrewskih-1/22/2008
111Really looking bad for Neom now with their stock reaching sub penny today. And brewskih-1/22/2008
110Appears that the Neom pumpers are once again trying to represent what I said or brewskih-1/22/2008
109Its probably worth noting as well, on the subject of private versus public compabrewskih-1/21/2008
108You have to love it. Now the claim is being made that there are companies trialbrewskih-1/21/2008
107I do like the fact that Sears is requiring that their employees demo the applicabrewskih-1/21/2008
106Then there is the claim that ATT must be in the pocket of NEOM, because Scanbuy brewskih-1/21/2008
105Next another pumper is claiming that the Scanlife application only works on 26 mbrewskih-1/21/2008
104The pumpers of NEOM have been very busy over the weekend putting out misstatemenbrewskih-1/21/2008
103WOW. I can't believe my eyes. They must be deceiving me. A recent news arbrewskih-1/19/2008
102Obviously, some posters in other forums, don't know how to read a pr, yet bibrewskih-1/17/2008
101I should of mentioned and provided the link to which of the 7 new patents I was brewskih-1/17/2008
100Now, if the user did not select a vendor of preference, the gateway will send babrewskih-1/17/2008
99I and others stated in 2005, that Neomedia's patents would be easy to work abrewskih-1/17/2008
98Interesting to see the battle between Scanbuy/Neomedia heat up. With the USPTO brewskih-1/17/2008
97Gavitec, Neomedia, and the Neoreader. Just what are the relationships here and brewskih-1/17/2008
96As I suggested. I went back and reread the March 30 2005, 100 million SEDA agrebrewskih-1/14/2008
95You have to love these two statements from NEOM in early 2005. I say early 2005brewskih-1/14/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):