SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RF Monolithics (RFMI)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
369 7 0 RFMI
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
119 Yes, I mean Individual Investor. I agree with you, and I NEVER buy their reccomTom Hofmann-5/19/1997
118 If RFMI continues growing at 100%+ as it did consistently in the last four quarMr.Creosote-5/18/1997
117 Thanks, for your replies. I agree that RFMI still looks good, in comparison witray c-5/17/1997
116 RFMI is finally getting some exposure. There is nothing wrong with that as longT. Jones-5/17/1997
115 Ray. I also hold RFMI bought at 10.125. I'm hanging on -- the near term lKimrric-5/17/1997
114 Ray - Individual Investor is correct - never get hurt taking a profit - but stomichael b greenberg-5/17/1997
113 Please excuse my ignorance, but when you refer to II, is that Individual Investray c-5/17/1997
112 Whatever you might say about II's stockpicking abilities, stocks mentioned Tom Hofmann-5/16/1997
111 I received II yesterday. There is a story on RFMI under the title of "strewang-5/16/1997
110 I have not received my II as of today. I will post once I read it. wangwang-5/14/1997
109 Did you see anything in II on RFMI?T. Jones-5/14/1997
108 Hey guys (Wang, Michael and others) do you still have those RFMI shares? Boy wMr.Creosote-5/13/1997
107 Two large blocks traded at 3:16 est 100,000 @13 7/16 and 100,000 @ 13 9/16. NiT. Jones-5/12/1997
106 T. Jones, I agree. You're absolutely right. I wouldn't touch SAWS wRex Dwyer-5/9/1997
105 The following are nice comparisons of SAWS and RFMI SAWS...http://www.marketguiT. Jones-5/9/1997
104 Yes! I have not get my II yet. But I checked their web site (www.iionline.com) wang-5/9/1997
103 Wang - I check site daily as I suppose you do - I like the current action in stmichael b greenberg-5/8/1997
102 Looks like you also visit here "very" often. Actually RFMI made an alwang-5/8/1997
101 poetic justice!!! - not long to go to see this stock really go - as Al Jolson smichael b greenberg-5/7/1997
100 RFMI HITS A NEW 52 WEEK HIGH AND THIS THREAD IS SPEACHLESS... IS ANYONE STILL IT. Jones-5/7/1997
99 I wish I'd got in Monday when they announced. What a knee-jerk reaction. Sam Armstrong-5/5/1997
98 Did not want to create rumor last nite but I concur in regards to magazine - bemichael b greenberg-4/29/1997
97 SAWTEK: What do you all think of their announcement to make a secondary offerindennis michael patterson-4/29/1997
96 Rex: good questions. Here are some answers, answers which indicate why Value dennis michael patterson-4/29/1997
95 Michael: I heard today that there may be an article in the Jonathan Steinberg mdennis michael patterson-4/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News