SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
OmniVision Technologies (OVTI)
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2273 66 0 OVTI
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1198UPDATE 2-TSMC hikes Q2 forecasts, reports rise in sales yahoo.reuters.com TaiwElroy-6/9/2005
1197They may be busy counting something but it's not inventory: "AmtechBMcV-6/9/2005
1196Well it's end of fiscal year, so they don't have to release earnings froElroy-6/8/2005
1195They must release earnings by the end of June.Labrador-6/8/2005
1194Maybe the call got delayed because they are berry, berry busy counting a large iTaro-6/8/2005
1193I spoke with OVTI's IR guy about why they haven't announced the date forElroy-6/8/2005
1192I wonder what kind of sensors a disposable video camera would use? money.cnn.comBrian-6/8/2005
1191Taro, max pain point for OVTI June options is $15, based on open interest on cborkral-6/2/2005
1190OK, rkral. I just posted and never checked the details. Also my expertise is elsTaro-6/2/2005
1189Taro, that poster has blinders on. The 9,984 June puts at $15 were ignored. Irkral-6/2/2005
1188From the Yahoo thread: <i>Re: JUNE CALL OPTIONS = 12,349 OPEN INT by: dblTaro-6/2/2005
1187BWAC, re "<I>do [ed: a short] by selling Call options.</I>"rkral-5/30/2005
1186"How do I short OVTI???" Only thing I know to do if your broker doesnBWAC-5/30/2005
1185BWAC, I happen to believe that OVTI is the greatest "secret" short opTaro-5/30/2005
1184In that case correct formulation of your question(s) would have been: "TheTaro-5/28/2005
1183I am assuming nothing. Just reporting the only data on hand I could find. As foTaro-5/28/2005
1182Biff the Hedge Fund clown said on CNBS he was often short more shares than the mBWAC-5/27/2005
1181BWAC, re "<I>official information which is published under the assumprkral-5/27/2005
1180Because he cited his source, with a link to official information which is publisBWAC-5/27/2005
1179BWAC, re "<I>You are assuming that ...</I>" Wondering ...rkral-5/27/2005
1178You are assuming that #1 somebody is actually regulating short sales at the funBWAC-5/27/2005
1177I just checked the link given by Elroy and the current official short interest vTaro-5/27/2005
1176How do you know its 18 million? Could be 118 million. Nobody is regulating this.BWAC-5/26/2005
1175Exactly! So how come that we have 18 million short positions out there? I mean, Taro-5/26/2005
1174Last time I did it said none available. But have not checked recently.BWAC-5/26/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News