SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LTX Corp. (LTXX)
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2126 38 0 LTXX
Emcee:  sallyu Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1201 I own LSI as well as LTXX. I've traded LSI over the past several years andGary L Schultz-4/12/1998
1200 Greg... I'll settle for that for THIS year. That info I posted was certainDuane L. Olson-4/9/1998
1199 Duane, I agree that 8 1/2 is not unreasonable, especially since it was tradingGreg Thornton-4/9/1998
1198 Yakov..Thanks for that useful bit of information. I am not expecting LTXX to mDuane L. Olson-4/9/1998
1197 Every year since '93, year high/year low ratio for LTXX had exceeded 2. Yakov Lurye-4/8/1998
1196 Greg...LTXX' Prospects still look good to this long-term lurker: The currDuane L. Olson-4/8/1998
1195 The biggest reason and negative about this stock is the answer to your questionjeffbas-4/8/1998
1194 Thanks, I guess that makes me feel a LITTLE better about things. I have to wonSteven D. Spurlock-4/8/1998
1193 Rob, The same is true for NSM and INTC regarding press releases about purchaseGreg Thornton-4/8/1998
1192 I think it is difficult to interpret the lack of announcements of new customersRob-Chemist-4/8/1998
1191 Reread post 1178. It was a bit confusing. But I understood it to say that therejeffbas-4/8/1998
1190 I too am a believer in this stock, but I have to admit I am bothered by the deaSteven D. Spurlock-4/8/1998
1189 Greg, I would add that his only messages are negative messages on LTX. I wonderjeffbas-4/8/1998
1188 Mr. Smith, I wonder if you could tell us all why it is that in the 6 months siGreg Thornton-4/8/1998
1187 For those of you following LTXX I strongly suggest re-reading posts # 990,1060,Mr. Smith-4/7/1998
1186 Jeffrey, Business is not as strong for LTX right now as it is for Credence andGreg Thornton-4/7/1998
1185 The stock has been underperforming TER and CMOS for several weeks. Further, by jeffbas-4/7/1998
1184 Jeffrey, Sounds like you need to learn the difference between stock performancGreg Thornton-4/7/1998
1183 Hi Jeff, Thanks for your input. I will trade it on a 1/4 point until I break evLEE SWIFT-4/7/1998
1182 Although I made the mistake of buying it at $5, I do think it was a mistake. Ifjeffbas-4/7/1998
1181 Hi, I am going to buy if I can get it today at 4 1/2. What do you think??? LeeLEE SWIFT-4/7/1998
1180 Yoou sound like you have been talking to the company. I have been getting thisfrank doolittle-4/6/1998
1179 "Yes, my expectations have become slightly more long term." I have hjeffbas-4/6/1998
1178 You ask too much Frank. I will not post the names of the companies that have pDavid S.-4/6/1998
1177 Gail, Sorry, but the rest of the sector is stumbling today, LTXX along with itGreg Thornton-4/3/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News