SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12023 >Are we looking at the end of independent head mfrs, I don't think so. Tom Simpson-5/27/1998
12022 Tom - Very interesting analyses. Are we looking at the end of independent heaZakrosian-5/27/1998
12021 PS.....actually I was driven to do this looking at RDRT. Their balance sheet loTom Simpson-5/27/1998
12020 Actually, (to get serious here for diehards) the big asset variable is the valuTom Simpson-5/27/1998
12019 Thanks, it works for me. : ) appro-5/27/1998
12018 >What was your source? : ) First column from Last QTR Results PR, second frTom Simpson-5/27/1998
12017 Four or five months ago this thread had more serious dialog about the outlook fAllen Furlan-5/27/1998
12016 Hmmm! Still chewing. Still good meat on the ribs, but we need BBQ sauce to maappro-5/27/1998
12015 SeanS; I have felt all along that this market will result in some attrition anStitch-5/27/1998
12014 Here you go.....chew on these. Looks like the market is saying that PPE will auTom Simpson-5/27/1998
12013 Some fresh air might help. Go outside and breathe deeply for five minutes, ree777 Captain-5/27/1998
12012 hmmm, down 13 percent on a new low? And with the Nasdaq fundamentals on a shorJ. P.-5/27/1998
12011 SeanS, are you suggesting the Titanic will never be recovered? Seriously, no oappro-5/26/1998
12010 Does anyone out there think that APM is going to recover ever, or do you think SeanS-5/26/1998
12009 I thought I heard a sucking sound. :) Stitch Stitch-5/26/1998
12008 Ron, I hope you will browse the thread and discover all the reasons this is noStitch-5/26/1998
12007 Speaking of squeezes, I squished out a few more shares short today at 5 3/8. WhFrodo Baxter-5/26/1998
12006 A few years ago I saw APM in Barron's at 6. I loaded up the truck (I had aRon Burns-5/26/1998
12005 Wow! 13% decline today on twice the normal volume. Is this the "squeeze&qStitch-5/26/1998
12004 Sheesh! I thought I did bad with 2 for 3! Spots-5/25/1998
12003 Good one Spots! I know that I got 1 for every 5 invested in APM. Lucky to get SeanS-5/25/1998
12002 Yeah, five of us split for each one continuing to post. Spots-5/25/1998
12001 Holy sh*t! What Happened here. I haven't been in this forum for almost onJay Rommel-5/25/1998
12000 AT, <<when APM went to 35+ he disappeard>> That must have been aboBrian Lempel-5/24/1998
11999 Self-correcting, AT. If you buy more you're shooting yourself. In the footSpots-5/24/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News