Verilink, long term hold? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Verilink, long term hold?

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
522	8	0	VRLK

Emcee: Scott Potter	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
122	BTW has anyone noticed that VRLK is trading way below its book value? It has cl	brian chan	-	4/22/1997
121	Hi Paul, Thanx for your post giving some needed details. You're right, the	Ronald Paul	-	4/20/1997
120	Well, I hope VRLK is basing here as I can find nothing in the report that indic	Paul Haynes	-	4/18/1997
119	The numbers are out and they are right where the company said they would be in	Paul Haynes	-	4/17/1997
118	Well its about what everyone was looking for.. So what happens tomorrow will th	terry gillham	-	4/16/1997
117	News biz.yahoo.com	Fred Puppet	-	4/16/1997
116	I went to the VRLK website for the first time today - very informative. I reco	Paul Haynes	-	4/15/1997
115	I, too, am encouraged by VRLK's stability on Friday. Tomorrow will be a bi	Paul Haynes	-	4/13/1997
114	New thread: Soes Favorites Hi Jim, I see you follow many different stocks. R	Street Walker	-	4/12/1997
113	The market down nearly 150 and we are holding steady. Bid 5 5\8 ask 6 nearly al	terry gillham	-	4/11/1997
112	notice how VRLK, not down this week, with so many other Techs getting hit....se	Jim Goodman	-	4/11/1997
111	Volume today was light only 70,000 shares until 30 minutes before the close.. T	terry gillham	-	4/10/1997
110	TO ALL: appreciate your posts here, and my "PSYCLE sm" recently also	Jim Goodman	-	4/9/1997
109	We can all agree this stock has hit a major bottom, right? '98 estimates lo	mark j. marvier	-	4/8/1997
108	Good research point, Thad. Book value as of the end of the last quarter (12/96	Paul Haynes	-	4/7/1997
107	I don't know much about Verilink but I did notice that as of 12/31/96 they	Thad	-	4/7/1997
106	cary, Did you watch the spread change? After the stock felll to 6, and over a	Keith Hepworth	-	4/7/1997
105	Keith, RE: "...100's of thousands of shares, mostly in very large blo	Cary Salsberg	-	4/4/1997
104	Keith, you are certainly correct about the market makets keeping the stock in t	mark j. marvier	-	4/4/1997
103	To Everyone, Ouch! I made a posting error. VRLK will be profitable this quar	Paul Haynes	-	4/4/1997
102	Kevin, Exactly, I feel the stock has been oversold and the technical indicator	Paul Haynes	-	4/4/1997
101	Kevin, I was watching vrlk minute by minute on the day it plunged from 16 to 6.	Keith Hepworth	-	4/4/1997
100	Paul, With the earnings report due 15 April and the stock floundering in the u	Kevin Stull	-	4/4/1997
99	Terry, I agree with your assessment. The stock has been in this trading range	Paul Haynes	-	4/4/1997
98	I think the bottom is in here. If you look at candlesticks yesterday we tested	terry gillham	-	4/4/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):