The truth about SI and IHUB | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The truth about SI and IHUB

An SI Board Since June 2003

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
124	34	0

Emcee: mmmary	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Welcome to "The truth about Silicon Investor and Investorshub." Here we shall discuss the history of Investorshub, who started the site, who financed it, who legally owns it. As Investorshub has just purchased Silicon Investors, this is need to know information. We shall also discuss how Investorshub came to buy Silicon Investors.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
122	When I got sued for decided to devote all my time to clear my good name. I did a	StockDung	-	6/7/2003
121	What happened to thetruthseeker.com ?	Sr K	-	6/7/2003
120	<B>IHUB's FATT MATT BROWNS's School paper<-He got a 100/A+!!!!!	StockDung	-	6/7/2003
119	ROTFLOLOLOL!!!	Spark	-	6/7/2003
118	Don't they have such re-education camps in China and Vietnam? Where one has	RockyBalboa	-	6/7/2003
117	If Bob did indeed suspend Mary "for life" he probably should have done	Mark Marcellus	-	6/7/2003
116	investorshub.com investorshub.com investorshub.com investorshub.com	bob	-	6/7/2003
115	Is she suspended for life??? Man, that's just terrible....LOLOL!!!	Spark	-	6/6/2003
114	I certainly hope that doesn't happen truthseeker. If it does we will all be	peter michaelson	-	6/6/2003
113	NICE POST PETER, BUT IF THIS WAS IHUB I COULD JUST DELETE YOUR POST. JUST MAKE U	StockDung	-	6/6/2003
112	HOW ABOUT THE POSTS MATT KEPT DELETED EVEN THOUGH THE INFORMATION WAS FACTUAL? I	StockDung	-	6/6/2003
111	marcos: Nicely put, thanks. You have articulately presented the attitude that	peter michaelson	-	6/6/2003
110	I'm well aware of that and at the time had suspended his account for it, res	SI Bob	-	6/6/2003
109	HOW ABOUT WHEN GOELO DELETED ALL THOSE MESSAGES ON THE SEAVIEW IHUB BOARD? THERE	StockDung	-	6/6/2003
108	You assume too much. <i>Notice on this board that posts 2,20,21,22 and 23	SI Bob	-	6/6/2003
107	Believe what you want flodyie, but it's pretty clear you're missing a cr	marcos	-	6/6/2003
106	Here is what Matt and Bob said about IHUB contrary to what they said to the publ	StockDung	-	6/5/2003
105	One time some old battle-axe was grinding on Winston Churchill for being a littl	marcos	1	6/5/2003
104	Double <sigh>.	dacoola	-	6/5/2003
103	flodyie, he was a kid for phuque sake ... don't tell us you were always pur	marcos	1	6/5/2003
102	Well, since you insist on obtuseness, I'll provide an additional analogy. Th	David Lawrence	-	6/4/2003
101	<b>There are many shades of crap.</b> Yep .... and, although i don&	John Walker	-	6/4/2003
100	Hello grubbie master, you let this big grub pass you by -g-? The party's al	Jon Khymn	-	6/3/2003
99	Weak to say the least.....What do you think about Zeev's 100% miss on the Na	Mark Johnson	-	6/3/2003
98	<i>TechniClone, Inc.</i> informagen.com Subject 14222 Which is th	Done, gone.	-	6/3/2003
97	funny, i never saw that thread. Guess the SEC did infringe. To:Jurgis Bekepuris	StockDung	-	6/3/2003
96	<i>Have you gotten your web node stock certificates in the mail yet?</i	Done, gone.	-	6/3/2003
95	Bet you signed up for webnodes when it was around. Have you gotten your web node	StockDung	-	6/3/2003
94	<i>You really though that I was serious that WebNodes should sue SEC for i	Done, gone.	-	6/3/2003
93	Its clear that my post was humor. You really though that I was serious that WebN	StockDung	-	6/3/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):