Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3276	17	0	DEC

Emcee: Dave Gahm	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1226	Take a look at the following Link: biz.yahoo.com They mention 10 specific pat	Bhooshan Urva	-	5/13/1997
1225	I live with (and sleep with) a lawyer. You said: "Your being frivolous in	Dan Spillane	-	5/13/1997
1224	He's mostly being frivolous with the word frivolous, and his money.	Tom M	-	5/13/1997
1223	Your being frivolous in your postings...you should change careers and become a	dmetro kormeluk	-	5/13/1997
1222	(directly from the frivolous mouth of DEC) "The patents relate to technolo	Dan Spillane	-	5/13/1997
1221	>>...so show me a single statment from DEC which suggests the lawsuit is	Bhooshan Urva	-	5/13/1997
1220	Dan: Here is what DEC says in its law suit: " The patents relate to tech	Kelvin C.P. Wang	-	5/13/1997
1219	Well, the press release said that the suit involves alleged infringement of 10	Jeff Dean	-	5/13/1997
1218	Dan, you are widely outside of your presumed expertise. Unless you were a seni	Greg Jung	-	5/13/1997
1217	Dan, give it up. A press release is general and would not contain the specifics	Bob Walsh	-	5/13/1997
1216	DEC does mention there is 10 patents being violated. Does anyone know what is	Eve Li	-	5/13/1997
1215	You are making an assumption that is not supported by DEC statements. DEC refer	Dan Spillane	-	5/13/1997
1214	CNBC says: (1) DEC has not contacted INTC previously regarding their claims of	Bob Walsh	-	5/13/1997
1213	I just went short INTC. If DEC's lawsuit doesn't take them out, the in	Barron Von Hymen	-	5/13/1997
1212	Analog: Agree with you 100%. What I want to say is we have caught you, INTC.	Kelvin C.P. Wang	-	5/13/1997
1211	You INTC guys are a bunch of idiots (this is my first flame ever). You have no	Analog Kid	-	5/13/1997
1210	SB re: <<PS: I think that the recent rally in DEC's stock was caused	Tom M	-	5/13/1997
1209	I disagree here. I'd say what universities teach IS at the core. Here we ar	Dan Spillane	-	5/13/1997
1208	Interesting side note. And this may be one of those old tales that sounds more	Paul Mathis	-	5/13/1997
1207	To All: There is some confusion regarding what DEC is suing for. I don't th	John Sladek	-	5/13/1997
1206	Dan; The issue is not what the schools teach or how companies use the technolo	stock bull	-	5/13/1997
1205	Thanks, Paul, finally a voice of reason. Let's just wait and see... which,	Secret_Agent_Man	-	5/13/1997
1204	It was hard to resist. Actually I suspect todays activity might be based more	Paul Mathis	-	5/13/1997
1203	Dan: DEC is suing Intel for techniques that are patented by DEC, not technique	Kelvin C.P. Wang	-	5/13/1997
1202	I think your in over your head in this discussion. It's an interesting top	Paul Mathis	-	5/13/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):