SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Gaming Lottery Corp (GLXW) - Good Prospects?
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
473 2 0 GLXW
Emcee:  Mark K. Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
123 Just a thought, but perhaps this is not their intention.White Shoes-10/1/1997
122 <<get some games going and quit fooling around with the 3D>> You arGreg R-10/1/1997
121 I agree - GLC is wasting too much time shooting for the moon. They need to get Tom W.-9/30/1997
120 Ya Greg, They have to line up with the red line through the symbols. I hit one Pete-9/30/1997
119 I've been accessing their site, but the games are not fully functional at tSteven Ivanyi-9/30/1997
118 I played the sonic slots a couple of times. I never have been able to figure oGreg R-9/29/1997
117 I've been on their site a couple of times. I played poker and had pretty goEd-9/29/1997
116 Steven; I'm able to access their site but I'm not able to try out any orichard-9/29/1997
115 You have to wonder whether they are more interested in getting their site up anWhite Shoes-9/29/1997
114 <<You'd think by now that they'd have some ot the bugs worked outSteven Ivanyi-9/29/1997
113 Galaxiworld site...Everytime I try to access it I am told it's temporarily richard-9/28/1997
112 How do you get to the NASDAQ site? Thanksrichard-9/26/1997
111 Galaxiworld will not be open to US residents - >gambling is rampant in NortTom W.-9/26/1997
110 Like??????????????????Gus Cusimano-9/25/1997
109 Steven, like the sector, don't like the company. There are others out therWhite Shoes-9/25/1997
108 Either way you look at it, GLCCF obviously closely watched by many, many peopleSteven Ivanyi-9/25/1997
107 I will be blunt. I think these numbers are completely false. At this rate theWhite Shoes-9/24/1997
106 I agree with your calculations ... good estimate. I'm holding for the longDan Thomas-9/24/1997
105 Thanks for the info. I guess all we can do now is wait for the money to start rrichard-9/24/1997
104 I remember seeing the number at 170,000 hits per day coming into the site. If ejoao bilt-9/24/1997
103 1750,000 hits per day supposedly according to Sept 15 report on Yahoo biz.yahoGreg R-9/24/1997
102 Has anyone heard how many hits the test site has had? As per their conference crichard-9/24/1997
101 >>Inpathique analysis had Corel at $14 later this year.<< I do notGreg R-9/21/1997
100 Greg, I remember that Impathique analysis had Corel at $14 later this year. InWhite Shoes-9/20/1997
99 >>What is Impathique Analysis?<< It is the discovery that the tradiGreg R-9/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):