SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Darvas Box Thread - Using the Nicholas Darvas system
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
498 20 0
Emcee:  Tomato Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
123 I see from the post about four down from yours about the Q&A that it's Tomato-1/6/1999
122 Jan, Dreman makes a great analogy that has had quite an effect upon my tradingSkyDart-1/6/1999
121 He states on p182 in the Q/A section that he strictly adheres to historical higjan_mike-1/6/1999
120 I think my father the Dreman lookalike is pounding away Texaco or one of the bijan_mike-1/6/1999
119 I'm quite sure he said all time highs. Since I'm pawing through the bojan_mike-1/6/1999
118 You necessarily buy good companies with the Dreman approach. Its value invesSkyDart-1/6/1999
117 >Even bad companies occasionally make new highs. Tomato, Is your underIceberg-1/6/1999
116 I've read Dreman. Not a bad book, but he's not like Buffett in the seTomato-1/6/1999
115 >I don't understand the difference you alluded to. They both establish aIceberg-1/6/1999
114 With Darvas, you buy good companies into strength in price. With Contrarian SkyDart-1/6/1999
113 I don't understand the difference you alluded to. They both establish a ceiHighTech-1/6/1999
112 >One difference is that P&F does not consider volume HiTech, To puIceberg-1/6/1999
111 Buy the best company in the most out of favor sector(s). That's it in a nujan_mike-1/6/1999
110 I read the Darvis book about three times a couple of years ago. A very interestHighTech-1/6/1999
109 GAC closed down! So tell me more about the opposite strategy (Dreman)? You buy Arb-1/6/1999
108 >>I don't agree, What Nick Darvas did was classic<< I believe SkyDart-1/6/1999
107 Your Dad's style is similar to Dreman [contrarian]. And Dreman's funSkyDart-1/6/1999
106 Today's Market Influences: 1. Ultravolatility of stock prices [100% or moSkyDart-1/6/1999
105 >>(Darvas) System worked today on ATHM, DELL, WCOM CMGI<< So did SkyDart-1/6/1999
104 SYstem worked today on WCOM, DELL, ATHM, CMGI Arb-1/6/1999
103 <i>I believe the keys are being comfortable with how you invest, assessinRobert Graham-1/6/1999
102 I agree. When a seasoned pro changes their style, the usually lose out. This Robert Graham-1/6/1999
101 >Today, we have different market influences than in Darvis' day >DARIceberg-1/6/1999
100 <To be competitive, one must use the full complement of modern tools.> Yojan_mike-1/6/1999
99 >Trust me; you cannot make money in the markets today using the Darvis methoIceberg-1/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News