SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An SI Board Since April 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
13111 103 0 PVCT
Emcee:  Jack Russell Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12336You missed the key activity ' identifying successful development stage compNTTG18/14/2013
12335I guess the real question is why didn't they do this after they saw the resuNTTG18/14/2013
12334Mimbari please see below from a couple of days ago. You're very quiet on thLT2011-8/14/2013
12333Time is running out on the wizard and the curtain is about to be pulled back on pro stock-8/13/2013
12332Patent on new formulation was in June. Then there is the manufacturing process, Mimbari-8/13/2013
12331Really? I mean really? You don't get it? Intellectual protection for next tMimbari-8/13/2013
12330You seem to be getting more and more unhinged.pincus-8/13/2013
12329No, I am asking why the company had to delay progress on a PIII trial design forNTTG18/13/2013
12328Back then? RB in formula! Now? Purer RB in formula and now patent protected. TreMimbari-8/13/2013
12327First, tell us how a company that treated patients in a PII trial 4 years ago haNTTG18/13/2013
12326How about proving that peer reviewed paper wrong then! Go show how their researcMimbari-8/13/2013
12325Dont think they really appreciated that back in 1989, you need good confocal micNTTG18/13/2013
12324Funny, I did not see that in the reference. The papers (peer reviewed for your aMimbari-8/13/2013
12323Hmmmm.....they would have mentioned that in their papers. Nice try on the retortMimbari-8/13/2013
12322" in general tumors are more acidic (pH 7.0) than normal tissue (pH 7.5)&quNTTG18/13/2013
12321You are one stupid scientist, that's all I got to say. I mean...WOW! World Mimbari-8/13/2013
12320cancerres.aacrjournals.org ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Dumbass. Do you Mimbari-8/13/2013
12319Do tell, wow...would be more interested in your evidence that cancer cell s are NTTG18/13/2013
12318NTTG...run to the Blog. The new post is out!Mimbari-8/13/2013
12317For those who have forgotten:Why does PV-10 work better than anything else out tMimbari68/13/2013
12316FOOL! The drug that failed had an inadequate way of vectoring. The problem with Mimbari-8/13/2013
12315NTTG, you are the biggest nut case I ever saw trolling a site. In the PIII they Mimbari-8/13/2013
12314Allovectin was an interesting approach, but as pointed out in more posts than yoNTTG18/13/2013
12313oh I thought Allovectin was the one to follow for PVCT?.. NTTG...hello?? Yahoo!jm2i123-8/13/2013
12312The basic flaw in the argument for a vaccine-like immune mediated effect is thatNTTG-8/13/2013
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News