SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Enterprise Informatics
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
13797 12 0 EINF
Emcee:  Robert Smith Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12347actually, i haven't seen the polls today. thanks for posting them....what doGreg h2o-1/26/2004
12346i see that you and the RNC saw the newsweek poll ths moring. time to start trashbob zagorin-1/26/2004
12345i could never make such comments, but someone who served with kerry has.... and Greg h2o-1/26/2004
12344<<I was quite upset that in The State of the Union address the president dGreg h2o-1/26/2004
12343I think most of us, regardless of political persuasion, would believe that the Hmahler_one-1/25/2004
12342it probably was the intlligence community (at least they're a good scapegoatbob zagorin-1/25/2004
12341Hi Bob: Interesting interview with Mr. Kay on NPR news this AM. I am sure you mahler_one-1/25/2004
12340well i'll reserve judgement until i finish reading and maybe check some of tbob zagorin-1/25/2004
12339Regarding the book Bob...I would like to read it as well, but be aware that thesmahler_one-1/24/2004
12338i agree with everything you said. although i've never supported bush, i did bob zagorin-1/24/2004
12337Yes Bob, I saw that article today in the NYTimes. In this instance, the NYTimesmahler_one-1/24/2004
12336January 24, 2004 Iraq Illicit Arms Gone Before War, Departing Inspector States Bbob zagorin-1/24/2004
12335fyi, here's a couple reviews on "american Dynasty" from Publisher&bob zagorin-1/24/2004
12334i agree. recusal is in order and would pretty much take care of the situation...bob zagorin-1/23/2004
12333I don't know about this one Greg...members of the Supreme Court must, at allmahler_one-1/23/2004
12332January 23, 2004, 8:53 a.m. Establishment Point of View Think record jobs and GDGreg h2o-1/23/2004
12331<<if the situation were reversed (if a democratic veep and and sc justice Greg h2o-1/23/2004
12330E-mail Author January 23, 2004, 8:40 a.m. Better or Worse? Should we believe theGreg h2o-1/23/2004
12329you don't see any problem with a supreme court justice going duck hunting wibob zagorin-1/23/2004
12328what's your point, bob? are you saying that a supreme court judge can be swaGreg h2o-1/23/2004
12327January 17, 2004 4:29 p.m. EST US VP, Supreme Court Judge Socialized Despite Enbob zagorin-1/23/2004
12326bob, as soon as you show me some tangible proof of any of your accusations, iGreg h2o-1/23/2004
12325<<look out...when and if Renquist goes ( and if GW wins ), Scalia is the nGreg h2o-1/23/2004
12324the real joke is that you can't see or won't acknowledge any of the confbob zagorin-1/23/2004
12323and if they've found such kickbacks, they should do exactly what they'reGreg h2o-1/23/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):