SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SNRS- Sunrise Technologies
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4140 25 0 SNRS
Emcee:  WILLIAM BLACK Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1240 David, FYI it is CUBBY not CHUBBY!!! Now, CUBBY might be CHUBBY...but let&Robert C. Petersen-7/6/1998
1239 CHUBBY where are you! Please post those level II's. I'm checking in occDavid Jones-7/6/1998
1238 I think anyone waiting to buy as the stock moves upward rather than trying to bJoe-7/6/1998
1237 Just received an e-mail from someone who felt that a LASIK procedure (2 eyes) wEmuGreg-7/3/1998
1236 How many procedures. there will be no shortage of patients, and volume will deSylvester-7/3/1998
1235 T.Bill -- Thanks for your post. It added something new: >> ActuallySylvester-7/3/1998
1234 Julianne - I'm proud of you for sticking to it...! I also used a yellow hLoren-7/3/1998
1233 Since it's a holiday and the charts are all quiet, perhaps we could share sEmuGreg-7/3/1998
1232 Joe, I just finished "Trading for a living", as per Loren's recomjulianne carol grimes-7/3/1998
1231 Rainier, We will really miss you on the thread! Thanks for all your DD and inKatz R Us-7/2/1998
1230 Ditto Double E's comment. You and several others on this thread have gotteJoe-7/2/1998
1229 VISX downgraded by 2 brokerage houses: biz.yahoo.comWally Mastroly-7/2/1998
1228 Top Vision Care Stock Performers for First-Half '98 Highlighted by OptiStocColby-7/2/1998
1227 THANK YOU RAINIER! Your contributions will be missed on this thread. Good lucDouble E-7/2/1998
1226 Hi All, I briefly posted on The Rational Analyst that I'm going to be takiHeyRainier-7/2/1998
1225 Whoops not that lucky it was 6 1/16 not a 1/32. Average numbers are right thougDavid Jones-7/2/1998
1224 Got to agree, never knew how much CHUBBY'S level II number's I relied oDavid Jones-7/2/1998
1223 Lucky you at 6 1/32. Based on the TA guys, I have had a limit order in at $6 fJoe-7/2/1998
1222 Sylvester, My prior concern had only to do with the instance where the price wHeyRainier-7/1/1998
1221 IMO things slowed down at 6 and we hit considerable support. At least I hope soDavid Jones-7/1/1998
1220 Rainer, Since we never came down to the 5 7/8 you were so concerned about, howSylvester-7/1/1998
1219 Saul, Thank you for your erudite explanations of professional short-sellers Robert C. Petersen-7/1/1998
1218 Sylvester, What the shorts accomplish with what they did is that they eliminatSaul H Rosenthal-7/1/1998
1217 I just got this message from Nanny containing a new DJ report forwarded from heE-7/1/1998
1216 Saul, Hoe do you feel about this today? It would seem that the stock should hSylvester-7/1/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):