SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1240 Nihil: I am long in both Imclone and Immunex. Like Imclone, Immunex has neverRoger Cranwill-2/21/2000
1239 Thanks. I can remember the opposite 3 or 4 years ago when I was invested in NOJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1238 Yes you made sense. Hard to argue with people like that, they seem to have somewho cares?-2/20/2000
1237 So do I make sense on how I responded to nihil last evening? I am still thinkiJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1236 I hope someday when you learn a bit more about the market, you'll look backwho cares?-2/20/2000
1235 Ramp, nihil must be short a lot of shares or lost his lithium some where. WTSherman-2/20/2000
1234 <i> I cannot say 100% that Imclone is for real</i> Don't worrySouthFloridaGuy-2/20/2000
1233 Nihil-- Even tho there is a great deal of truth in what you say--that managemenFred Levine-2/20/2000
1232 Of course, the price was higher, so no one was damaged by a drop in price. Try nihil-2/20/2000
1231 Wish I were in CREE. Congratulations.nihil-2/20/2000
1230 <i>Let them threaten me. Diluting stock intentionally is theft. It is illunclewest-2/20/2000
1229 <I am also glad Imclone is not succumbing to possible takeovers by larger biJack Hartmann-2/20/2000
1228 Timid stockholder??? Careless?? Uninformed? I should say not. But at least Jane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1227 Sorry Jane. The Board has a duty to disclose, and if a stockholder gets wind ofnihil-2/20/2000
1226 Thank You..... JaneJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1225 There is no requirement that a bid above market be submitted to the shareholderchalu2-2/20/2000
1224 Common sense is telling me that your interpretation of corporate law is wrong. Jane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1223 What does common sense have to do with corporate law? Check this out. prickettnihil-2/20/2000
1222 I really dont think there is a law that exists that requires a company to submiJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1221 But in some cases the shareholder never learns of a proposal unless it is made Jane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1220 You had better move to a country where stockholders have no rights at all. I renihil-2/20/2000
1219 Gosh... Re-reading your statement I just thought ...say what?? So, if last yeJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1218 Thank for your valuable contributions to corporate law. Directors are required nihil-2/20/2000
1217 Please point me to where it is written that a BOD are obligated to accept an abJane4IceCream-2/20/2000
1216 You are wrong. If the Board of Directors refuses an above market price cash ofnihil-2/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News