SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ZINC The base metal. News and Views. Symbol Zn
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3270 112 0 DJCIIZT
Emcee:  Stephen O Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1245Here's another MMGG angle. One reason I haven't bought into MMGG so farLoneClone-5/11/2006
1244My eyes are focused on the after tax IRR of 31% based on (then) "current prtyc:>-5/11/2006
1243YZC currently 1,786,000 on bid @ .45 <i>Of course, when a feasibility stu4C-5/11/2006
1242<what is the point in summarizing a report if they are just taking garbage frloantech-5/11/2006
1241the summary i worked off is pretty flawed based on your comments. what is the hugh thorne-5/11/2006
1240If you use years 3-5 from the cashflow table on page 6 rather than the 3-year avMr. Aloha-5/11/2006
1239>>"As he says those that know it best, love it the least" I apptyc:>-5/11/2006
1238regardless of how they allocate the cash flow, after all if they pay off the asshugh thorne-5/11/2006
1237Well MMGG vs the other zinc stocks will be interesting to watch. I was surpriseloantech-5/11/2006
1236I recall the bashing by the thread moderator, and refusal to place MMGG in the hjackjc-5/10/2006
1235Absolutely. Many investors won't touch a bulletin board stock, particularlyMr. Aloha-5/10/2006
1234The top of page 6 says it shows "what the available cashflow would be for dMr. Aloha-5/10/2006
1233The best part of the EZM quarterlies IMO -- no dilution for Aljustrel: "AtLoneClone-5/10/2006
1232EZM up 13.7% after hours to $3.03 due to the Cramer effect. Best to all.gparker940-5/10/2006
1231Mr. Aloha, I talked to the guy at MMGG some time back. He indicated they are worloantech-5/10/2006
1230the excerpt i am pulling from: * Average annual cashflow in first 3 years is eshugh thorne-5/10/2006
1229If you look at the cash flow table on page 6 of the feasibility study, the annuaMr. Aloha-5/10/2006
1228YZC - report: the synopsis i see on it suggests annual cash flows on a fully dilhugh thorne-5/10/2006
1227So the YZC question is: hold or fold? I'm still in the green, but not by muGib Bogle-5/10/2006
1226Don Coxe would be chuckling at the base level prices of metals used. As he says Stephen O-5/10/2006
1225Actually tyke, and this will be good for you, Ruddock was viable at $0.45/lbs Zihypeman01-5/10/2006
1224doing some further digging... seems that depending on the success of trenchinghypeman01-5/10/2006
1223There are plenty of metal deposits profitable at prices far below todays, and thjackjc-5/10/2006
1222>>todays metal prices mean nada And as for speculating on higher prices ityc:>-5/10/2006
1221Seems like deja vu with Corriente Resources. I don't own YZC but did own soseventh_son-5/10/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):