SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Xicor ?
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2920 17 0 XICO
Emcee:  john rentchler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1245 Mike - thanks for sharing your analysis. I heard that bookings are better than jeffbas-2/27/1997
1244 I cannot speak for Mr. Olivier, but I suspect he is still keeping with his ofteMichael Sphar-2/27/1997
1243 Mike - P.S. Based on a contact with Julius today that I am aware of, I think yjeffbas-2/26/1997
1242 Mike - I admire your courage. I am more like the "cowardly lion". Byjeffbas-2/26/1997
1241 Hi Jeff, A couple things you might also consider as pluses: The new fab manageMichael Sphar-2/26/1997
1240 I do not know if the price has taken everything into account - and that is the jeffbas-2/26/1997
1239 Jeffrey, what I don't understand is XICO has a trailing PE of only 10. DespRamsey Su-2/26/1997
1238 Paula - My post and your last sentence are the problem - long time holders are jeffbas-2/26/1997
1237 Thanks Jeffrey, but you essentially repeated the point of my earlier post, i.e.John Posatiere-2/25/1997
1236 Jeffrey, If your buy-in price is $2 then why don't you sell and smile on tPAR-2/25/1997
1235 To develop new products for which there is demand but not have the equipment injeffbas-2/25/1997
1234 Jeff, as a relatively new XICO watcher, could you tell me how exactly the managJohn Posatiere-2/25/1997
1233 I think that you are dreaming, John. I just hope that the decline stops short jeffbas-2/25/1997
1232 The chart has essentially been consolidating (or flat) for almost 2 months now,John Posatiere-2/25/1997
1231 Jeffrey, Both EEPROM and Flash allow in-system writable non-volatile storage. Monte Doherty-2/25/1997
1230 Flash is more efficient than EEPROM for large memory devices such as are used fMonte Doherty-2/25/1997
1229 To all: New low 7 3/8 today ( within 1 month), Some bad news? and the volume ichen hong-2/25/1997
1228 Steve, this may seem like a cop-out but I don't think it is appropriate to Monte Doherty-2/25/1997
1227 Fidelity's 13f form is now on Edgar for the quarter ending 12/31/96. It shoglenn s. turner-2/25/1997
1226 Please go read the entire filing on Edgar (I have). The filing was with respecjeffbas-2/25/1997
1225 Would you briefly compare for a non-tech person like me EEPROM, Flash and Xicorjeffbas-2/25/1997
1224 HI DON! If the information in message #2364 of the OAKT-thread is correct then shasta23-2/24/1997
1223 Monte - From your message, I get the impression that FLASH is generally much mRob-Chemist-2/24/1997
1222 So this Grayson Electronics product that is going to use flash vs. EE at 1/3 thsteve olivier-2/24/1997
1221 I have no quibbles about your argument of 16bit vs. 8bit micros. Each is usefuMonte Doherty-2/24/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):