SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Premisys Communication (PRMS)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1775 11 0 PRMS
Emcee:  JakeStraw Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
125 I agree when P/E's are high, you must beat expectations, but PRMS P/E is quClam Clam-1/16/1997
124 CC, PRMS got punished for being good, but not as good as everyone expected. EveJakeStraw-1/16/1997
123 I am the proud owner of more PRMS stock ($28.375). Trying to catch a falling kClam Clam-1/16/1997
122 Hi, The networking analyst at Needham just quit, so I can't get any researPeter Jones-1/16/1997
121 Oakville, PRMS has a much better product reputation than Verilink and more iClam Clam-1/16/1997
120 What does IAD mean? Thanks.Amy Chan-1/16/1997
119 It is particularly surprising that the stock was beat up today considering the Oakville-1/16/1997
118 I am surprised by today's action as well. It must be a downgrade by a brokClam Clam-1/16/1997
117 Yes, I'd also like to know what's going on. I thought .23 was in line wMark Svereika-1/16/1997
116 Can anyone explain today's continued sell-off in PRMS? I listened to the cPeter Jones-1/16/1997
115 The number is working now. If the stock sells off because of the days sales ouClam Clam-1/15/1997
114 It is 23 cents. ------------------------------------------------ PRMS EarningsZhang, Daniel-1/15/1997
113 Same problem. I just spoke to IR and the lady I spoke to, Joyce, said she'Serendipity-1/15/1997
112 Conference call replay number is (402) 220-5193 but I couldn't get it to wClam Clam-1/15/1997
111 .23 cents was IN LINE with estimates :)Just4fun2-1/15/1997
110 23 cents per share for the quarter ended December 1996. Anyone know what the FSerendipity-1/15/1997
109 Jay Jayaraman, I agreed with you 100%. This Press Release is more comfusing tAndy Lam-1/10/1997
108 I don't get it. If the payment of $4 million covers the next 3 years, why Serendipity-1/9/1997
107 Narashimba Reddy Kamma, You are right! I mis-read it and thought the 9c chargeAndy Lam-1/9/1997
106 Can anyone get me a copy of the Needham & Co. report dated 12/27. ApparentlNick DeFilippis-1/9/1997
105 Misunderstaning of PRMS announcement David J.Smith, I think the downdraft on SNarasimha Reddy Kamma-1/8/1997
104 Thanks for the great insight clam clam... Regards, PremieJust4fun2-1/8/1997
103 I think part of the reason for the drop is because Premisys relies on resellersClam Clam-1/8/1997
102 Real story driving this stock is this report from Frost & Sullivan: biz.yahJust4fun2-1/8/1997
101 Andy Lam Premisys did not pre-announce the earnings for the quarter ending DeNarasimha Reddy Kamma-1/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):