SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACT NETWORKS
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2326 7 0 ANET
Emcee:  Ellison Ting Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
126 The bounce up may have provided those week (scared) stockholder an opportunity RMP-3/25/1997
125 I'm in again today at 13 1/4. And to think I was thrilled to get in at $30Todd N. Weisrock-3/25/1997
124 Not a thing from II. They never seem to do anything until it's too late toSteve Borg-3/25/1997
123 Hello Everyone, I have been following this stock for the last couple of weeks hFrederick M. Ward-3/25/1997
122 This sure is ugly. Steve, have our friends at II posted anything? I must admit Scott Brooks-3/25/1997
121 Oops! Dipped to $13 1/2. New low. Volume up a bit. No news.Steve Borg-3/25/1997
120 Anyone got any ideas on today's volatility? Up to $17 7/8, then down againSteve Borg-3/25/1997
119 Ron, Mark, Thanks for the post. I originally bought ANET based (partly) on II&Lenny Ehn-3/25/1997
118 While its true that ANET trades at 18 times 1998 estimates, it also trades at 2Chuck Agger-3/24/1997
117 Individual Investor came out with the following today: ANALYSIS (Posted 3/24) RMP-3/24/1997
116 Here's the latest update from Individual Investor, for what it is worth, MaMark Chavez-3/24/1997
115 You are right, ANET is being lumped with other FRAD and networking companies whLenny Ehn-3/24/1997
114 To all: FRAD companies are reporting below expectations. First CSCC. Friday MaFIFO_kid2-3/23/1997
113 << I think that if you step back and look at the situation in 6 or 8 mos.Chuck Agger-3/23/1997
112 Ok guys, we are going a bit off topic. The point is that short term confusion/uScott Brooks-3/23/1997
111 Its PE ratio is not 40 if you do your homework. You basically got if off from Andrew Q. Viet-3/23/1997
110 TNCR had a low pe, and Value Line ranked it as bargain basement stock. They alsTWC-3/23/1997
109 <<Yup, I remember TNCR well. The difference is that TNCR had a very, veryScott Brooks-3/23/1997
108 I haven't seen any other negative info on ANET. Steve's response #102 rRMP-3/23/1997
107 It is always funny how I tend to make long term decisons on short term informatScott Brooks-3/23/1997
106 I havent heard anything negative per se, but I'm second-guessing myself BIGChuck Agger-3/23/1997
105 If you want to make comparison, you better do your homework, my friend. I am sAndrew Q. Viet-3/23/1997
104 Chuck, I'm in at $24 1/4 and I'm pretty pissed off, too. At the time Steve Borg-3/23/1997
103 Ron, have you seen anything positive on ANET besides the Individual Investor wrChuck Agger-3/23/1997
102 Ron- It seems that ANET is taking the brunt of some negative investor psycholoStephen Ettorre-3/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News