SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Friede Goldman International,Inc. (FGII)
An SI Board Since October 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
676 5 0 FGII
Emcee:  Pasaul Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
126 >>Alert: FRIEDE GOLDMAN SAYS IT HAS NO IMMEDIATE PLANS TO ISSUE SHRS<&Jack Be Quick-1/16/1998
125 JACKSON, Miss.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 16, 1998--At a special meeting today, stotaLuis-1/16/1998
124 REDMOND, Wash., Jan. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- The following articles appeared exclusitaLuis-1/16/1998
123 Greg, thanks for trying to clarify the confusion over additional shares. Your pMathon Dabasir-1/16/1998
122 I believe FGII might surprise slightly to the upside, maybe .21 or .22 or so, bVelocipher. -1/15/1998
121 I strongly belive that fgii will beat earnings, unless that latest aqusition woGabor-1/15/1998
120 I'm not suggesting that using stock to acqire another company is necessarilcharger-1/14/1998
119 That is exactly what Worldcom did, and alot of others as well. Anyway, I wouldVelocipher. -1/14/1998
118 You got it. If the directors do control 54% of the shares, then you and me andcharger-1/14/1998
117 I've never heard of anything so ridiculous. How can you say that printing charger-1/14/1998
116 Let's have some fun speculating here. What could FGII do with its new 125MTom DuBois-1/14/1998
115 You're getting the idea, remember the new shares used 14 million, will becoVelocipher. -1/14/1998
114 Thank you for the explanation. I'm new to this, so the example helped a lottaLuis-1/14/1998
113 Thank you.You are correct again.I own to much of this stock,however I feel thatGabor-1/14/1998
112 Don't really understand your post. It would seem to me that if you own the Velocipher. -1/14/1998
111 You maybe obsolutaly correct,however people in Louisiana have other reasons.ThaGabor-1/14/1998
110 That is correct, so do you think he would dilute himself? Think about it, if heVelocipher. -1/14/1998
109 Using stock for an acquisition is not dilutive, let's hypothetically say thVelocipher. -1/14/1998
108 The ceo own 43% of all the stock.He receives stock options at below our cost.Gabor-1/14/1998
107 Charger: We agree on the 5-for-1 split and/or dilution action. Very doubtful. WMathon Dabasir-1/14/1998
106 Increasing the number of shares outstanding through splits is non-dilutive in tcharger-1/14/1998
105 Please explain how this is good for the CEO? His salary is tied to the stocks pVelocipher. -1/14/1998
104 Companies are forced to raise the authorized shares all of the time. When FGII Velocipher. -1/14/1998
103 All should vote against such a proposal.This proposal is only good for the the Gabor-1/14/1998
102 At the risk of sounding uneducated, I've never heard of a company raising tcharger-1/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):