SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (ALTH)
An SI Board Since July 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
226 18 0 ALTH
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
126TD, we left Sebastopol a few years back and now divide our time between SC and Ntom pope-5/4/2004
125Tom, I might take a position again if I can get them for $1.50 or less...the onlArthur Radley-5/4/2004
124Crikey, the darn thing opened around 1.50 and I was on the phone with my wife tatom pope-5/4/2004
123This from Allos late this afternoon: "ODAC reviewed data submitted by the cArthur Radley-5/3/2004
122conference call.... Two ops to stop ongoing trial for efficacy. European "scaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
121PDT...... <pre>Buy 9,000 Limit 2.42 Day Only 10:18 am 05/03/2scaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
120Thanks, very much, for the reporting. It's a miracle, one "yes" vscaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
119<<filled while I was gone playing school bus>> We must be on the saquidditch-5/3/2004
118sounds like the best of possible outcomes, to me. the FDA's statisticians cscaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
11716-1...appears they weren't even playing horseshoes with this drug.Arthur Radley-5/3/2004
116As a matter of fact, on mature reflection - looks pretty thintom pope-5/3/2004
115thanks. make that Pluto and sumthin. posts at yahoo indicate that there was onscaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
114RSR rejected... Message 20088019zeta1961-5/3/2004
113There's this, but not too many people come to me to evaluate pipes based on tom pope-5/3/2004
112yeah, I'm talking relative valuation and book/pipe discrepancies. keep in mscaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
111It's down about 3.60tom pope-5/3/2004
110whew. there must have been an offering subsequently? if not, then when the no scaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
109a buck a share, according to Yahoo, over a year's burn, from a quick looktom pope-5/3/2004
108guess I should have been prepared.... GNTA.... anyone..... what's casscaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
107GNTA re-opened at 5, dropped as low as 4.50tom pope-5/3/2004
106pretty brief meeting compared to GNTA... The subanalysis presenter was actuallyzeta1961-5/3/2004
105your welcome... interesting contrast...GNTA had top brass people make public stzeta1961-5/3/2004
104zeta: Thanks for the updates. gregGreg Rich-5/3/2004
103shux... Very dry presentation...right now the committee is trying to figure outzeta1961-5/3/2004
102just elevator music. but thanks for trying! (eom)scaram(o)uche-5/3/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):