SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
SPRL - Strat Petroleum, Ltd. (Bulls Board)
An SI Board Since July 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2322 47 0 SPRL
Emcee:  cmgibubba Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1272As I have said before, these <i>bash-Bozo's</i> can sincerely &ljmhollen-4/12/2005
1271To: Oilsybub (who wrote) 4/11/2005 10:24:25 PM From: StocksrStocks My accountOilsybub-4/12/2005
1270Hi em, An acquisition of the nature PR'd should be significant enough to gejmhollen-4/12/2005
1269This is excellent press.I love this one more and more with each PR.Would love toBenny-Rubin-4/12/2005
1268Could be a long wait........ Previously swamped with obtuse PMs also, I finallyjmhollen-4/11/2005
1267This is getter better and better every week!emOilsybub-4/11/2005
1266stilllllll waiting..........Oilsybub-4/11/2005
1265I read that and could not believe SI was down when it happened. This is HUGE newTadsamillionaire-4/11/2005
1264<i><b>Strat Petroleum, Ltd. in Discussions to Acquire a 49% Interestjmhollen-4/11/2005
1263The IMF said that rising living standards in China and the rest of the developinTadsamillionaire-4/11/2005
1262<i><b>Gazprom and BASF sign memorandum</i> RBC, 11.04.2jmhollen-4/11/2005
1261No, just curious as to how on 3/20 you don't even know who Joseph is, then aOilsybub-4/10/2005
1260Date : 2005-04-10 China contributes to one quarter of World oil demand By Mendakjmhollen-4/9/2005
1259Seems like you have the same problem as Strat Nut.StocksrStocks-4/9/2005
1258To: jmhollen who wrote (1067) 3/20/2005 9:36:24 AM From: StocksrStocks Read RepOilsybub-4/9/2005
1257To: Oilsybub (who wrote) 4/9/2005 5:28:48 PM From: StocksrStocks No comment eOilsybub-4/9/2005
1256To: Oilsybub (who wrote) 4/9/2005 5:27:04 PM From: StocksrStocks No comment oOilsybub-4/9/2005
1255To: Oilsybub (who wrote) 4/9/2005 1:17:42 PM From: StocksrStocks Tell that toOilsybub-4/9/2005
1254Please stop PMing me! Post publically!Oilsybub-4/9/2005
1253And publically post your answer, as I cannot respond to a PM.Oilsybub-4/9/2005
1252What do you mean in your messgae to me, "Joseph was not pleased with the lOilsybub-4/9/2005
1251stocksr, I am NOT going to argue with you on this. I have done my DD, and you spOilsybub-4/9/2005
1250You are right. There is nothing wrong in providing with us with unaudited finanStocksrStocks-4/9/2005
1249900 shareholders with less than 13 shares. I don't think so. Also quotedStocksrStocks-4/9/2005
1248That was 1200 BEFORE the r/s. It is much lower now, as TONS of people were left Oilsybub-4/9/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):