SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NETM: Whats the BEEF?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2599 17 0 NETM
Emcee:  Steven S. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1274 Does anyone know what the short interest has been for NETM the last few months.jim A-2/10/1997
1273 We should see 4 very soon. Book value is possiblejim A-2/10/1997
1272 Larry, i just read over Q report and still see a Q4 OPERATING loss even if you jim A-2/9/1997
1271 < but the bottom line is revenue/earnings, and NETM is now losing money withLarry J.-2/8/1997
1270 Frank, I'm in at 11.5 and am thinking of getting back in but there is no injim A-2/8/1997
1269 excuse me - not buying under 4 am buying on dips under "5" sorry for FRANK IRWIN CALOVICH-2/8/1997
1268 only the following info on netm @ z olde 1-27-97 neutral major broker 11-1-9FRANK IRWIN CALOVICH-2/8/1997
1267 Larry...I got alert of upward change in Zacks rating for NETM..it is now a 2 (1van wang-2/8/1997
1266 ROCK, I looked at the Zack rating and still see 4 analysts all with holds (3.0)Larry J.-2/8/1997
1265 I'm trying to have faith but it's wearing thin. A positive is that NETMjim A-2/6/1997
1264 Hello Jim, coming around after some month here at the NETM thread, I just remeSpekulatius-2/6/1997
1263 I'm long but i'd be careful with this one. The technicals indicate thatjim A-2/6/1997
1262 Zacks did upgrade NETM ,once it breaks out of the 5-5 1/2 range we should be fiROCK-2/5/1997
1261 A BUY on NETM. That's great! I just bought in at $5 today. ...WaitMLAHR-2/5/1997
1260 dharampl, any idea which brokerage/analyst upgraded NETM. Since us pions can&#Larry J.-2/5/1997
1259 z=zacks..all the bestvan wang-2/4/1997
1258 who is "z"?FRANK IRWIN CALOVICH-2/4/1997
1257 Finally z has issued a B U Y on netmanage. The sentiment here is so low that idharampal luthra-2/4/1997
1256 NETM recently appoint new president in Japan which is 20% of their business comYujin Maison-1/31/1997
1255 Larry, excuse me for jumping in and stating the obvious. This one will not movStu E.-1/31/1997
1254 Another up day for the NASDAQ and technology, another loser for NETM. Very discLarry J.-1/31/1997
1253 Very disappointing today, especially when competitors are moving up (FTPS, NCDIjim A-1/30/1997
1252 I bailed out, but waiting to get back in at $5MLAHR-1/29/1997
1251 No Offense taken Van ... Thank you for the website ... I'm really interesteJay Rommel-1/29/1997
1250 Jay...no disrespect...just thought it would help to get an overview of current van wang-1/29/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News