SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
13582 145 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Ramsey Su Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12857 I agree with ALR regarding net royalties. That's one reason Q is even consitradeyourstocks-6/22/2000
12856 I have never heard it mentioned in regards to the ERICY agreement that Q pays EValueman-6/22/2000
12855 Value, This whole debate over what will flow into Q's pocket with WCDMA haThe Verve-6/22/2000
12854 Vman, perhaps you misunderstood what I mean by the term "net royalty rate.A.L. Reagan-6/22/2000
12853 <b>If anyone can throw up any investing ideas, anything at all, please doengineer-6/22/2000
12852 Lost Brazil? The country is slathered in CDMA, which will soon be 1X while GSM Valueman-6/22/2000
12851 <i>However, I have never heard IJ say that Q is indifferent between makinValueman-6/22/2000
12850 Is 9600bps good enough? Interesting post from another thread.... Message 1392w molloy-6/22/2000
12849 <i>Seoul and Beijing have agreed to form a specialist cquidditch-6/22/2000
12848 Great read, engineer. I'd have been happier if it had been posted on the 3quidditch-6/22/2000
12847 Eric, having said this (prior post), your observation bears some dissection. Yquidditch-6/22/2000
12846 (Found this on the CDG web page while trying to find info on all the 1800 Mhz sengineer-6/22/2000
12845 The battle will occur in the Orient! We have good news out of Taiwan and the Ctechguerrilla-6/22/2000
12844 Brazil - in my view, Anatel's decision was predictable. Brazil views itsquidditch-6/22/2000
12843 Korea, China to Form CDMA Telecom Specialist Conference nikkeibp.asiabiztech.Dennis Roth-6/22/2000
12842 >> when did Alcatel sign up? << We don't know what part of the Dennis Roth-6/22/2000
12841 Factual information from CDMA development group on current service providers insag-6/22/2000
12840 June 20, 2000 Wireless Industry Evolving Rapidly Says Report By Mobile ComKent Rattey-6/22/2000
12839 limtex. If a European country was lucky enough to hs=ave a Microsoft, do you tJohnG-6/22/2000
12838 I don't know where "D-band" is. My take is this is a license fee Dennis Roth-6/22/2000
12837 Eric, You said, "How cheap is cheap..." I'd love to get your thoDWB-6/21/2000
12836 Major mobile phone makers to tap CDMA market news.cens.com Taipei, JunDennis Roth-6/21/2000
12835 <What was your point in posting it yet again just to ask the question,Ruffian-6/21/2000
12834 Dennis, << Brazil also announced they would auction a fourth mobile teleEric L-6/21/2000
12833 >> What is your point? << That the same news story doesn't havDennis Roth-6/21/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News