SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1288 jmac, all: What are the appropriate theories here. down-gap by 20, retraceGreg Jung-5/30/1997
1287 What does it look like on a Fib. fan? It might give an idea where the bulls wiDoug R-5/30/1997
1286 INTC currently trading at a 5/8 retracement of the recent low, the NAZ is currSteelBlueIce-5/30/1997
1285 we are breaking 140!. We may test 127 again. I can't believe it. This hajmac-5/30/1997
1284 jmac, I meant the Cyrix part was not significant, compared with the profit warRoad Walker-5/30/1997
1283 It was significant. Intel warns that 2Q revenues will be 5-10% less than 1Q. jmac-5/30/1997
1282 Well, th ebreak of 160 and 155 and 150 is happening this morn. we are in troubljmac-5/30/1997
1281 Ted and all, Just heard, Intel issued a revenue/profit warning for 2Q. Not siRoad Walker-5/30/1997
1280 John Just a lurker on this thread, but anyone know what's going on with INTed H-5/30/1997
1279 jmac, Yes, I didn't like yesterday afternoon's breakdown. I kept expecRoad Walker-5/30/1997
1278 No, I think the old high was successfully penetraded. Heck, the stock went up jmac-5/29/1997
1277 It was a very disappointing day. The only promise is that a newsletter I subscjmac-5/29/1997
1276 jmac, I echo your sentiments. Let's stick with Intel/stock matters. --LKlinda k-5/29/1997
1275 Well, tomorrow's action will answer our puzzling questions. I do think itChris-5/29/1997
1274 Jmac, Can you say the old high was successfully penetrated. I am not so sure. Gregory Cole Brock-5/29/1997
1273 Chris, no need to lay low. Your input is valued by many on this thread. Your gjmac-5/29/1997
1272 I guess you are now really worrried. So am I. You don't make a new high bjmac-5/29/1997
1271 Chris, please keep up the great work, you know how much i have learnt from you Sonki-5/29/1997
1270 Chris, Appreciate your charts AND your input, as I'm sure everyone does. Road Walker-5/29/1997
1269 Another note: Is INTC having trouble moving up above because of the <b>tChris-5/29/1997
1268 jmac, You said: "As for bonds putting a cap on stocks, I don't think Road Walker-5/29/1997
1267 Sonki, I don't wish to get involved in the back and forth between you and Ijmac-5/28/1997
1266 John, I am very very pleased with Intel's actions today. As for bonds puttjmac-5/28/1997
1265 Bullish intermediate and long term. But I thought there was a TA rule of thumbjmac-5/28/1997
1264 Tom, Flipping through the charts I see generally healthy stocks. I like usingSteelBlueIce-5/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News