SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ultra OTC Fund - UOPIX
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2063 27 0 UOPIX
Emcee:  OldAIMGuy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1288Hi Tom, yes, I think redemptions are part of what I am looking for, I also saw bob wallace-2/27/2001
1287Hi Bob, I was reading a quick segment at the trim tabs site. Here's the headOldAIMGuy-2/27/2001
1286Hi Jim, Here's a live camera shot from Port Washington, WI. touchtmj4.com WeOldAIMGuy-2/25/2001
1285Nice talking with you Jim, and thanks for sharing the wisdom of the ages with meTodd Reichardt-2/24/2001
1284Todd; Re <i> I don't agree. Individual sectors can have higher volatilJames F. Hopkins-2/24/2001
1283<<<Playing stocks , and or sectors has more built in risk/reward than tTodd Reichardt-2/24/2001
1282Hi Todd; Playing stocks , and or sectors has more built in risk/reward than the James F. Hopkins-2/24/2001
1281Hi Jim, Today my smoke and mirrors are suggesting some signs of life for NDX, bTodd Reichardt-2/23/2001
1280Hi Jim, "Date Rape" with being privileged with more IPO allocations! LOldAIMGuy-2/19/2001
1279Hi Tom; re> <i> As nasty as the market has been, I was surprised to seeJames F. Hopkins-2/18/2001
1278Hi Jim, As nasty as the market has been, I was surprised to see my Idiot Wave nOldAIMGuy-2/18/2001
1277Thanx Tom; & I like the idea of a composite of several indicators making up James F. Hopkins-2/18/2001
1276Hi Jim, I see Todd already gave you the IW page link. It's a composite of foOldAIMGuy-2/18/2001
1275Intereting, I'll show you mine I don't watch overbought or oversold indTodd Reichardt-2/17/2001
1274Todd; Thanks for the url to Toms Idiot Wave, as for the bounce.. Well my thoughtJames F. Hopkins-2/17/2001
1273Hi Jim, Why do you expect a bounce? Double bottom? I'm curious because I Todd Reichardt-2/17/2001
1272Tom ; I see us making a bounce in 1 to 3 days.. 200 NDX pts anyway..maybe a goodJames F. Hopkins-2/17/2001
1271Hi Todd, It looks like 2X was on the LONG's side today. Best regards, ToOldAIMGuy-2/14/2001
1270You're taking what I said out of context. The point is that you are always lTodd Reichardt-2/14/2001
1269Hi Todd, I initially looked at the idea of switching from UOPIX to say QQQ when OldAIMGuy-2/14/2001
1268Todd wrote: <I> This means in order to make money, eventually the underlylabestul-2/14/2001
1267Hi Tom, I've always wondered how the eroding due to the 2X daily compoundiTodd Reichardt-2/14/2001
1266Hi Bob, Just a quick note for you regarding sentiment. I read the headline on TWOldAIMGuy-2/14/2001
1265Hi John, The "percentage game" seems to still be a plague for UOPIX. HOldAIMGuy-2/14/2001
1264John funny thing - I was riding in he car this AM when G's prepared text hibob wallace-2/13/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News