SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters"
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2390 1 0
Emcee:  rodster397 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1290 I was kidding, you dolt! pez pezz-1/5/1999
1289 also Whitman from New Jersey (already re-elected once).Peter O'Brien-1/5/1999
1288 <i>Second, marriage is a civil contract. I don't know what state theyLizzie Tudor-1/5/1999
1287 Amen to that, Frank. As usual, your analysis is right on track. Bill-1/5/1999
1286 <i>And I dont think there is anything wrong with [an open marriage] The Philosopher-1/5/1999
1285 My own vow included "being unto thee a true and faithful husband so long aThe Philosopher-1/5/1999
1284 Former Gov Ann Richards (Dem-Tx) was elected. In Ca, the primary went to Gray Lizzie Tudor-1/5/1999
1283 New governor of Arizona, don't know her name off hand. Only one I'm awThe Philosopher-1/5/1999
1282 <i><< Are you arguing that the Supreme Court should have known in aThe Philosopher-1/5/1999
1281 Yes I do. I think they have an arrangement. And I dont think there is anythinLizzie Tudor-1/5/1999
1280 Do you believe Bill and Hillary have an "open" marriage? Frank Frank Griffin-1/5/1999
1279 The difference is Elizabeth Dole has class. It is amazing how they pretty wellFrank Griffin-1/5/1999
1278 <i>But we should expect that when they take a wedding vow they comply witLizzie Tudor-1/5/1999
1277 Can you list any elected governors that are republican women? Im just curious,Lizzie Tudor-1/5/1999
1276 << Are you arguing that the Supreme Court should have known in advance tpezz-1/5/1999
1275 Again, congress would have had to spend NO time on it if Clinton abided by the Bill-1/5/1999
1274 Well, I tried to put forth a substantial issue about which we could debate. ButBill-1/5/1999
1273 Well then, how much time has<i><b> Congress</i></b> spepezz-1/5/1999
1272 No, they just rejected his argument that it would. It was Clinton's self-fuBill-1/5/1999
1271 Your answer is snide but, I note, nonresponsive. Let me ask you directly: 1. The Philosopher-1/5/1999
1270 You know, Atty. Hodgkin, there is some ambiguity in the English language. I woDaniel Schuh-1/5/1999
1269 Right. Mr. Clinton-is-the-antichrist is just the guy to give me a lecture abouDaniel Schuh-1/5/1999
1268 << The Supreme Court voted 9-0 to proceed with it.>> Is this the depezz-1/5/1999
1267 No. But we should expect that when they take a wedding vow they comply with itThe Philosopher-1/5/1999
1266 <i>Sexual relations = sexual intercourse.</i> Dead wrong. Many maThe Philosopher-1/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):