SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1290Yes, that may well be the case... but, in the real life world of big people and GROUND ZERO™-6/19/2002
1289I don't think evidence really matters to Chrissy and Duh-ray if a Republicanjlallen-6/19/2002
1288Maybe they just need some assistance in sorting out fact from fantasy... we canGROUND ZERO™-6/19/2002
1287I can only do what I can to help those who are concerned about wrongdoing in ourGROUND ZERO™-6/19/2002
1286GZ, I read your exchanges with Duh-Ray and Chrissy poo. Nothing but speculation jlallen-6/19/2002
1285ROFL!! This is quite typical of Duh-Ray...jlallen-6/19/2002
1284Good, let's see what comes from all their sorting out of all the bits and piGROUND ZERO™-6/19/2002
1283My background is irrelevant to my sincere request for evidence... >><iGROUND ZERO™-6/19/2002
1282CHENEY'S DESTRUCTIVE LITTLE GAME Quincy, Re: <i>The economic impactRaymond Duray-6/19/2002
1281The economic impact outside of California can't be overstated due to this crQuincy-6/19/2002
1280Always wondered what our deficit would look like after four years of Gore.Quincy-6/19/2002
1279yep.....it's not possible with a moron right wing zealot lawyer of all thingSkywatcher-6/19/2002
1278portage, Re: <i>I was prejudiced against these robber barons from day 1,Raymond Duray-6/18/2002
1277Raymond, just don't call me objective. I was prejudiced against these robbeportage-6/18/2002
1276portage, Re: <i>I thought we wrapped up this investigation a year and a Raymond Duray-6/18/2002
1275Hell, Raymond, what took 'em so long ? I thought we wrapped up this investiportage-6/18/2002
1274F*ck ! I thought we had a good clean jlallen-free zone going here on this boardportage-6/18/2002
1273Since the crisis went from roughly May 2000 to May 2001, I don't think DemocDavesM-6/18/2002
1272That's fine that you're coming from that distinct discipline....at this Skywatcher-6/18/2002
1271GZ, Re: <i>I was an Officer for the State of Florida and I conducted thouRaymond Duray-6/18/2002
1270Okay, thanks for your explanation... you say you are sure, but you have no clearGROUND ZERO™-6/18/2002
1269>><i>Cheney knew damn good and well that...</i><< How dGROUND ZERO™-6/18/2002
1268I won't go into what the people who are investigating the entire procedure aSkywatcher-6/18/2002
1267GZ, Re: <i>My intent is not to defend Cheney or to argue frivolously, buRaymond Duray-6/18/2002
1266Okay... well, what do you suspect Cheney is guilty of doing? Is he violating anGROUND ZERO™-6/18/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News