SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
VocalTec (VOCL)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2349 23 0 VOCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1299 Mr. Poretz, While I have no interest in involving myself in your d*ck-measurinS. Edry-4/5/1998
1298 Well Doug after flooding me with 17 private msgs I hope this is your last one.ASTK1-4/5/1998
1297 Mr. Poretz, without wanting to get involved in your dispute with Mr. Slater, whDon Walster-4/5/1998
1296 Short and pithy is better than long and emotional. BillBill-4/5/1998
1295 TO THE READERS OF THIS THREAD: I am sorry I took bandwidth for this. If you sDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1294 MY RESPONSE # 9: A SUMMARY Mr. Slater, you are an uncouth jerk who knows littDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1293 MY RESPONSE #8: OUR APPROACH TO THE ETEL INVESTOR RELATIONS STRATEGY: In respDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1292 To Doug: AS a pr man I would expect you of being knowledgeable of what happens STK1-4/5/1998
1291 MY RESPONSE # 7: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT MY PERSONAL STOCK ACTIVITY You have accuseDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1290 My response # 6: MY VIEW ABOUT VOCLF One of the most bewildering of your commDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1289 MY RESPONSE #5: MY BIG MISTAKE I am a believer in many things as relates to mDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1288 MY RESPONSE # 3 WHY I POSTED ORIGINALLY ON THE VOCLF AND NSPK BOARDS. As partDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1287 MY RESPONSE #1: -------------------------- Dear Mr. Slater: I am very glad toDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1286 The entirety of my response, in order, follows. Unfortunately, it is too long tDoug Poretz-4/5/1998
1285 To: charles slater From: Doug Poretz STK1-4/5/1998
1284 MY BIG MISTAKE I am a believer in many things as relates to my businesSTK1-4/5/1998
1283 OUR CLAIMS ABOUT MY PERSONAL STOCK ACTIVITY You have accused me of doing aSTK1-4/5/1998
1282 To: charles slater From: Doug Poretz STK1-4/5/1998
1281 To: charles slater From: Doug Poretz STK1-4/5/1998
1280 charles slater From: Doug Poretz STK1-4/5/1998
1279 Can you believe this idiot sent me 12 private msgs,You people better bail causeSTK1-4/5/1998
1278 Why did ETEL's stock price rise from 6 to 14? Because in LAN TIMES they teAlexStocks-4/5/1998
1277 VOCLF versus ETEL I read VOCLF's and ETEL's last filings with the SEC AlexStocks-4/5/1998
1276 DEVIL YOU play both sides of the fence all the time.Which one feels the best toSTK1-4/5/1998
1275 FCC Internet phone fee could hit consumers, companies NEW YORK (Reuters) - A FWilliam Mcdouglas-4/4/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):