INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS

An SI Board Since December 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1513	9	0	INTC

Emcee: jmac	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
13	Jmac, I'm looking for a low opportunity to buy back in. Can't do	Wayners	-	1/7/1997
12	INTC did breakout the upper trading range today, and then what? Sell off or wh	Xpiderman	-	1/7/1997
11	BREAKOUT---BREAKOUT--BREAKOUT	jmac	-	1/7/1997
10	So much for symmetrical triangles.	jmac	-	1/7/1997
9	I can't believe that intc will give anyone another chance to get in at 130	jmac	-	1/6/1997
8	Agree - the 130 - 140 range holds and can be traded until a breakout or breakdo	Gary105	-	1/6/1997
7	To All: Looks like another INTC failure at 141 again. The symmetrical tri	Wayners	-	1/6/1997
6	Carl, so far my intc puts are down 10%, my asnd puts are up 20+%, the gap theor	Gary105	-	1/4/1997
5	Gary, Puts on Intel! If you are the maker you will make money, as a buyer you a	carl a. mehr	-	1/4/1997
4	I realize this is a technical discussion, but intel is neither technically or f	mike gates	-	1/4/1997
3	INTEL: I believe that INTC is overbought and is due to hype and hope. Watch the	Hans Schmitz	-	1/4/1997
2	jmac, Check out the increased volume over the past couple of weeks without an	Mike Harkness	-	12/26/1996
1	jmac, a contrarian opinion - I expect gap in the 90 range set in Sept to be fil	Gary105	-	12/26/1996

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):