USWeb (USWB) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
USWeb (USWB)

An SI Board Since December 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1188	18	0	USWB

Emcee: Labrador	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
13	What a joke...this stock has no busines being above 9	Bill Bishop	-	12/8/1997
12	H & Q was the underwriter. Appears they did a lousy job - bagged the poo	Louis Riley	-	12/8/1997
11	MM, Did H&Q do the IPO, or did they recommend USWB? Also INTC has formed a	Sandra	-	12/8/1997
10	MiniRambus!	emil	-	12/8/1997
9	Whatever it is.. USWB sure is hitting the BIG-TIME here! MM	Money Machine	-	12/8/1997
8	Two more words: Hambrecht and Quist	Louis Riley	-	12/8/1997
7	Will, I was surprised as hell when I got some shares too. I am kicking myself	Money Machine	-	12/7/1997
6	I agree. Received some shares on the IPO, but could have gotten more in the aft	adad69	-	12/7/1997
5	Intel's investment will help, yes. But more importantly, it's their tra	Money Machine	-	12/7/1997
4	Dale, one world, Intel. GF	G.F.	-	12/7/1997
3	Devil's advocate: this is a field which any number of established firms or	Dale Baker	-	12/7/1997
2	i hope that you are right. no earnings until at least 1999, but they are settin	Labrador	-	12/7/1997
1	Okie, let me get this thread rolling here. Since nobody else seems to want to g	Money Machine	-	12/7/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):