SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
14610 39 0
Emcee:  Original Mad Dog Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13010LOL!!!! now that was too funny.Jorj X Mckie-4/12/2004
13009The banning Wallendas.Alan Smithee-4/12/2004
13008Message 20015014 <i>never</i> say <b>Wallendas</b>Rainy_Day_Woman-4/12/2004
13007I'm thinking of one........... [huge smile]Rainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
13006Um. I thought that was a "maid" from Nantucket... I have an entire bAlan Smithee-4/7/2004
13005I am not creative enough to come up with a limerick all on my own. I know severOral Roberts-4/7/2004
13004Zonder limerick contest. My entry. There was a young lass from Algiers WhosAlan Smithee-4/7/2004
13003yup, a very good example... damn, I just went and got a haircut and missed the Jorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
13002yep box proudly admitted he baited him [the braggart] look where it got him? Rainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
13001clueless <g> as to him or what if any his previous aliases were nor do I Rainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
13000<i>yes but he didn't ban him after that</i> true...but the arguMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12999yes but he didn't ban him after that actually I thought Dave showed restraiRainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
12998<i>lb made this comment: "There are some who have legitimate law suitMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12997<i>The clueless comment was probably uncalled for. Although, if it was a tMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12996I always believed in SI's policy of banning people who bandy about lawsuits Jorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
12995nope, it certainly doesn't. But contributory negligence should be brought iJorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
12994actually, Dave called him "clueless" 30 min before the GFY comment. BuJorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
12993i think he's referring to this Message 19985860 that's the post that eMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12992<i>I do have to say that I believe more leeway should have been given connMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12991<i>The box guy was the first one to start with ad hominem, though subtle&lRainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
12990reading the that thread gives a little different view of things than the summariJorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
12989:) genious jimmy have a funny line for just about any situationMulhollandDrive-4/7/2004
12988hehehe, canned response stop being so resourceful damnit!Rainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
12987yes, you could have been the first to do me, but no, you gave the honor away to Rainy_Day_Woman-4/7/2004
12986your first banning? oh shoot, I could have done that for you. I would need toJorj X Mckie-4/7/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News