S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE)

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
14577	37	0	SIII

Emcee: stock talk	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
13052	Jan, as you know I like this company, but something is not going right with its	stock talk	-	6/1/1999
13051	<However, it is a real stretch that S3 is singled out for the reasons menti	stock talk	-	6/1/1999
13050	Your information on S3 has been pretty good, aside from being informative and	Jan A. Van Hummel	-	6/1/1999
13049	S3 selling off because of fears of Intel chip sales being down and concerns ove	stock talk	-	6/1/1999
13048	Another CL Savage4 review: lostcircuits.com	Chris Tomas	-	5/31/1999
13047	Jan, I agree... No one can deny the positive business S3 has developed in the	John Nasser	-	5/28/1999
13046	Another excellent example as to why I've ALWAYS said that Jan A. Van Hummel	JerryP	-	5/28/1999
13045	Hi I am still in it as well. Frank-ly (no pun intended) S3's future is si	Jan A. Van Hummel	-	5/28/1999
13044	Greg: Nice call on DIR. I tried to buy it on the day of the IPO, but I was neve	stock talk	-	5/28/1999
13043	Frank, You say the market has rewarded the turnaround in NOVL by taking the st	Ghassan I. Ghandour	-	5/27/1999
13042	<As far as being in the dark about what's going on .... now you're i	stock talk	-	5/27/1999
13041	Frank, I'm a bit surprised. We've been chatting on this thread for wha	JerryP	-	5/27/1999
13040	All, I finally sold the stock at a small loss for three reasons. 1) CEO selling	stockroach	-	5/27/1999
13039	Stock--Relax Again, the Street is waiting for proof. I've played a lot of	snoop dog	-	5/27/1999
13038	I want to make something clear, I'm not negative on the company. I'm ju	stock talk	-	5/27/1999
13037	If I'm not mistaken the market saw NOVL fundamentals improving NOVL stock p	stock talk	-	5/27/1999
13036	<but what has changed in the fundamentals> They have improved and are b	stock talk	-	5/27/1999
13035	What is going on with this stock is happening all over the board with other tec	Ghassan I. Ghandour	-	5/27/1999
13034	Good points all...but what has changed in the fundamentals? Maybe this is just	snoop dog	-	5/27/1999
13033	I don't like the term "cheerleader", I would say I call em as I s	stock talk	-	5/26/1999
13032	Stock--You were previously a big cheerleader. What happened? Maybe the IBM ne	snoop dog	-	5/26/1999
13031	If you look at all the design wins over the past few weeks by graphics chip com	SBHX	-	5/26/1999
13030	Interesting info on UMC. Looks like 1st qtr y2k should be good time to go publ	David K.	-	5/26/1999
13029	As much as I hate to say this, this stock is in really trouble. You couldn'	stock talk	-	5/26/1999
13028	Jerry, I think the low 6' are good also, but worry with Frank as to why it	Zeev Hed	-	5/26/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):