SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14627 28 0 PMU
Emcee:  James Cook Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13077 Is anyone able to post this latest 05/09/00 snippet from Stockwatch? <i>Quickdraw-5/11/2000
13076 I'll ask the question Phil, I would suspect there is enough rock up there tQuickdraw-5/11/2000
13075 Quickdraw, thanks for the new info. Looking forward to the update when you'Phil Jones-5/11/2000
13074 Hi Nexus and grampa, I am sure PFG is not happy either. They have recognized Quickdraw-5/11/2000
13073 Hi Qd, The delay in the road contruction is the first disappointing devellopmeNexus-5/9/2000
13072 charred, Do you have any experience at all in these matters? The reason I ask iBill Jackson-5/9/2000
13071 Must be frustrating to be that close and not able to finish as expected. As agrampa-5/9/2000
13070 Hi grampa, Ross and all, I just got off the phone with Barb and CMS and will pQuickdraw-5/9/2000
13069 I was wondering if SI was broken. None of the threads I follow regularly have Ross Mickey-5/9/2000
13068 Anybody there -- or are we all just waiting for news?grampa-5/9/2000
13067 Spoke to a friend who provided a few highlights of Bob Bishops May 2, 2000 repoQuickdraw-5/3/2000
13066 sky and all, Its my understanding that Bob Bishop has just put out a favourablQuickdraw-5/3/2000
13065 <<it could be 6% of the stratigraphy, but could represent 50% of the resoQuickdraw-5/3/2000
13064 Ouch charred, Has it come to this ... name calling, and here I thought we wereQuickdraw-5/3/2000
13063 How about you. Seem to have more time to post than most analysts. No job? skynight-5/3/2000
13062 "but it seems clear they did want to test the carbon-bearing rock. Even thcharred-5/2/2000
13061 "Ya, sure, I'm going to accept his analysis, without yet having drillecharred-5/2/2000
13060 charred, Regarding your comments on the metallurgy, it is clear that of courseQuickdraw-5/2/2000
13059 charred, So this clearly exceptional, unemployed geologist from Newcrest knowsQuickdraw-5/2/2000
13058 "It doesn't seem like they are trying to hide anything here does it&qucharred-5/1/2000
13057 I heard that the black silica or the carbonaceous sandstone was the high grade.charred-5/1/2000
13056 <<my question was that why do two bottle roll tests on 4% of the resourceQuickdraw-5/1/2000
13055 charred, I agree we must wait for metallurgical testing from the first drill pQuickdraw-5/1/2000
13054 About the metallurgical testing, it is way too early to say all this. To do a pcharred-5/1/2000
13053 Hello Quickdraw, about the adjacent properties, SWG and Newmont is one of the bcharred-5/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):