SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
13582 145 0 QCOM
Emcee:  Ramsey Su Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13107 <Even IF NOK was at Qualcomm headquarters today (which I guess this confirmsRuffian-6/23/2000
13106 <I also believe IDCC and QCOM will be able to offer each other successfRuffian-6/23/2000
13105 Darrell, << call them Eric. ask them >> Now that it is clear to mEric L-6/23/2000
13104 <i>I see the IDC mob is more anxious about the NOK/Q deal than we are. Whpostyle-6/23/2000
13103 Samim. Your reply is probably the best response I've read all day. NoneD.J.Smyth-6/23/2000
13102 I see the IDC mob is more anxious about the NOK/Q deal than we are. Why? Want Ruffian-6/23/2000
13101 <i>I wonder how long NOK is going to give IDCC to figure out 2G CDMA? Perpostyle-6/23/2000
13100 Darrell, peterson's article was published on Prudential's website for tsamim anbarcioglu-6/23/2000
13099 Yes Benjamin. That is wonderful analysis; especially for this news related siteD.J.Smyth-6/23/2000
13098 ROTFLMAO! eom.Ruffian-6/23/2000
13097 Eric call them Eric. ask them. he apolgoized because he felt the DowJones imprD.J.Smyth-6/23/2000
13096 a great post from Yahoo board from Pfinz IMHO: 1. Nok can't take over qcomSteve Warkentin-6/23/2000
13095 Darrell - There is one thing that we must all credit IDCC for - They were tfoundation-6/23/2000
13094 Darrell, Re: the post of your own (as "Corpgold") that you link on Eric L-6/23/2000
13093 Samim nothing personal. NOK Investor Relations told investors today that PeteD.J.Smyth-6/23/2000
13092 JGoren. Why should QCOM enter into a temporary chip supply deal with NOK? Why nJohnG-6/23/2000
13091 Samin, The Pete Peterson article I posted was lifted from Prudential SecuritieIbexx-6/23/2000
13090 Darrell Smith. Gee Darrell, I don't believe a word you say. Where the hell JohnG-6/23/2000
13089 hello darrell, i just read your post about peterson's apology to NOK for besamim anbarcioglu-6/23/2000
13088 Just Dropped by, normal run of the mill visit...<g>r.edwards-6/23/2000
13087 Kieth <<Nokia is barely willig to budge>>. You don't really belJohnG-6/23/2000
13086 Kieth. NOK has waited too late to strike a deal and lost part of their negotiatJohnG-6/23/2000
13085 Keith. Thanks very much for the personal verification of the QCOM-NOK negotiatiJohnG-6/23/2000
13084 Benjamin, regarding Pete Peterson and Qualcomm comments: (something more to laD.J.Smyth-6/23/2000
13083 Darrell - Chuckle. regards, blgfoundation-6/23/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News