SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1313>> I am sure they will have soon the same impression of you as we have. &David W. Taylor-7/28/2000
1312David, since you posts are all general and directed at the ``overvaluation'&Bernard Levy-7/28/2000
1311The market is reconsidering it for me.David W. Taylor-7/28/2000
1310Yes, the chip sector is getting whacked. It's funny how your price target hagpowell-7/28/2000
1309Finally, the chip sector values are starting to fall in line with reality. NOK David W. Taylor-7/27/2000
1308Yawn.... David, this game of yours is getting old. Come back in one year and iThe Ox-7/24/2000
1307Selling opportunity. Mr. Market is telling you something...David W. Taylor-7/24/2000
1306I forgot to mention that BRCM's management is aware of the fact its overpricBernard Levy-7/24/2000
1305Bernard, in a way you are on target,still if I was granted 20:1 ratio of BRCM storson sanderson-7/24/2000
1304I don't read Cramer because, as I stated before, his views and mine don'MeDroogies-7/23/2000
1303>> What I find odd is that you seem to think he has such insight, yet he rDavid W. Taylor-7/23/2000
1302I think the error in your post is the concept of "beating" anyone. ThMeDroogies-7/23/2000
1301Actually, the mystery is how BRCM can find any engineers willing to work for it.Bernard Levy-7/23/2000
1300How can CNXT beat BRCM if insider at BRCM control 30% and have more incentive toorson sanderson-7/23/2000
1299Ummm...the fact that I mention 2 things doesn't mean those are the only 2 thMeDroogies-7/22/2000
1298MeDroogies?? Are you saying that someone, who is wrong, in your opinion, on twoDavid W. Taylor-7/22/2000
1297You miss the point. If he is a blowhard, and you think he's wrong on ORCL (MeDroogies-7/22/2000
1296Cramer is indeed a classic blowhard. I agree with him most of the time. He is David W. Taylor-7/21/2000
1295If you agree with Cramer, then you're buying ORCL right now... Goes to shoMeDroogies-7/21/2000
1294Hey!!! I thought I was the one around here who usually makes blanket statements.David W. Taylor-7/21/2000
1293Mo-mo isn't part of the institutional behavior. Steady accumulation and latMeDroogies-7/21/2000
1292What is "usual" or "typical" mean? It's a new industryMeDroogies-7/21/2000
1291Today's close above $38 is technically significant CNXT lifted off of its bMyStoxGoUp-7/20/2000
1290Yes, I agree that institutions are also speculating here. This is where the mo-David W. Taylor-7/20/2000
1289>> I guess that David disagrees with CSFB's price target of $100/shareDavid W. Taylor-7/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News