SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NANO
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2272 39 0 NANO
Emcee:  Norrin Radd Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1322 hi jdn: that's a good idea. what about the numbers in the quarterly and ansunshine-11/6/1997
1321 hi wade: i don't remember those posts. if they are that good, then we shousunshine-11/6/1997
1320 Sunshine, on westergard I don't have an opinion. I didn't like his &quoCrossy-11/6/1997
1319 Dear Sunshine: I was very involved in that news. Followed it closely even hadJDN-11/6/1997
1318 Dear Sunshine: Sounds good to me. I will go back and reread their last press JDN-11/6/1997
1317 Dear McDuck: QUACK QUACK. No intention to mislead. We have no knowledge of aJDN-11/6/1997
1316 sunshine, I remember there were several excellent posts written by Byron about Wade-11/6/1997
1315 hi tom, too bad about the no trade. maybe the mm was just cranky? or somethingsunshine-11/5/1997
1314 hi wade, sounds like you have the beginning of a letter there. would you like sunshine-11/5/1997
1313 Hi sunshine, It is best to have a "soft campaign" which means to infoWade-11/5/1997
1312 dunno, sunshine, but when i tried to buy more at an 1/8 over the bid today, thetom pope-11/5/1997
1311 kevyn, when i bought nano at 6 something last year, my broker said ok, market sunshine-11/5/1997
1310 hi jdn and all, i can help with some of the mail tech issues. but there are tosunshine-11/5/1997
1309 crossy, now that you mention pru, maybe we should add the brokerage houses, ansunshine-11/5/1997
1308 tom, i don't think our threat of an e-mail campaign did squat. but just insunshine-11/5/1997
1307 crossy, i'll settle for rich.<g> (eom)sunshine-11/5/1997
1306 hi wade, you are equally amazing. i'm hoping you will take part in this tosunshine-11/5/1997
1305 hi jdn: hi crossy: crossy, you did a really great job on that list. jdn, sinsunshine-11/5/1997
1304 > My $20 target is also conservative - if You compared it with KLAC valuatioKevyn Collins-Thompson-11/5/1997
1303 Kevyn, being conservative always helps when investing. My $20 target is also coCrossy-11/5/1997
1302 > I would say that a fair valuation should put NANO at least at $20. CrossyKevyn Collins-Thompson-11/5/1997
1301 <<...you point out the industrys switch to 300mm waifer [sic] and that NAMcDuck-11/5/1997
1300 Dear Crossy, Sunshine, Wade and all: First off, I split the difference my averJDN-11/5/1997
1299 Norseman, quite the same. My average entry point is $9.5 regards CROSSYCrossy-11/5/1997
1298 From your mouth to God's ears. 20 sounds great to me. I'm in at $9Norseman-11/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News