Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
14627	28	0	PMU

Emcee: James Cook	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
13277	Pacific Rim Mining Corp. LIVE and INTERACTIVE Video Chat Conference... This is	shearson	-	7/10/2000
13276	I just had a quick conversation with Catherine Mcleod-Seltzer. She returned fro	Quickdraw	-	7/10/2000
13275	Don't you think $50/oz is at the high end? What recent deals give you comfo	Enigma	-	7/10/2000
13274	Charred, Let's discuss it further. Even if we take the figure of 27 million	hank2010	-	7/10/2000
13273	Hank, there is more to it than that, $30 never. The amount of shares for examp	charred	-	7/10/2000
13272	Phil, I do not think he was involved in Ariquipa, I do not remember his name fro	hank2010	-	7/8/2000
13271	Hank, was Tom Shrake involved with Aeroquipa? I thought that he only came on bo	Phil Jones	-	7/8/2000
13270	Nexus. I think we are saying the same thing, but you are more articulate. I mad	hank2010	-	7/8/2000
13269	Hank, <<But what about PFG management? They are all rich based solely on	Nexus	-	7/7/2000
13268	Elizabeth, I do not understand what you mean by Shrakes' bet. EOM	hank2010	-	7/7/2000
13267	Ya, I know all this but what is Shrakes bet? Back to you, do you know this?	Elizabeth Andrews	-	7/6/2000
13266	Elizabeth, That is $30.00 per share. I would expect in situ to go for at least	hank2010	-	7/6/2000
13265	So is that $30 per share or $30 per ounce in situ?	Elizabeth Andrews	-	7/6/2000
13264	Diabillos is not economic and may have a present value of less than 3% of the cu	Elizabeth Andrews	-	7/6/2000
13263	Yes and No Enigma, look at the property pictures. It is hard to imagine positiv	hank2010	-	7/6/2000
13262	With these things the surface gold could have come from somewhere else - glaciat	Enigma	-	7/6/2000
13261	Hank, $30 sounds very good to me!! If it's offered, I'll take it! :)	Phil Jones	-	7/6/2000
13260	Phil, I do not think 8 million ounces is the upperlimit. Consider that gold min	hank2010	-	7/6/2000
13259	I'm recently back on this thread - but not yet in the stock - and don't	Enigma	-	7/6/2000
13258	Enigma, what price do you see us all leaving at? Elizabeth thinks the current p	Phil Jones	-	7/6/2000
13257	Enigma, Re: Africa is not sexy. You are right, in fact sometimes it is downright	hank2010	-	7/5/2000
13256	Phil - as speculators we have to hope that drilling anticipates the <i>pos	Enigma	-	7/5/2000
13255	Quickdraw, assuming that Luicho did show 8M ounces, what do you foresee as PFG&#	Phil Jones	-	7/5/2000
13254	Quickdraw, I reported this to SI yesterday. Maybe others have also. Your comme	Phil Jones	-	7/5/2000
13253	Yes - but many retail holders of Pangea think they were taken to the cleaners -	Enigma	-	7/4/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):