SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Core Gold Inc
An SI Board Since March 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2131 56 0 CGLD.V
Emcee:  pstad60 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1331One of my concerns was that DMM would be training the workers, and then same worAmark$p-10/22/2012
1330Exactly what are those options, though ... think maybe they haven't been setmarcos-10/22/2012
1329Thanks marcos, seems there's at least some positive sentiment toward mining Terry Maloney-10/22/2012
1328I also noted the following in the Mining Act. MINING ACT TITLE IV OBLIGATIpstad60-10/22/2012
1327Municipio de Zamora respalda proyectos mineros Domingo, 21 de Octubre de 2012marcos-10/22/2012
1326According to Silicon Investor here is what free speech is ... whatswrongaroundupstad60-10/21/2012
1325This should be a most interesting and intellectually stimulating conversation topstad60110/20/2012
1324'<i>Had some fun there tho before I got banned.</i>' - yeah marcos810/20/2012
1323'400k' - hmm, not familiar with the individual, but there seems possibilmarcos-10/20/2012
1322O.K. good excuse to make it to the SF Hard Assets conference. I usually registerzebra4o1-10/20/2012
1321Marcos.... "How would trends in attention span work, as an explanation ..pstad60-10/20/2012
1320Brader2 dynastymining.com See Page 11. under the heading : 5. Environmental Cpstad60-10/20/2012
1319Question for the board. Is there not already a decline at the Jerusalem propertybrader2-10/20/2012
1318well i run a fair forum unless you've crossed me in the past.. so sisyphos iklinker-10/20/2012
1317When is a forum not a forum...a head's up. sysaphus[graphic]2 10/19/2012 8:klinker-10/20/2012
1316Well we are talking about a relatively paltry amount relative to what is sloshinTheSlowLane-10/19/2012
1315Think relying on internal cash flow may cause slower development on developing tAmark$p-10/19/2012
1314Considering they have cash flow funding operations they should be able to get deTheSlowLane-10/19/2012
1313Actually, a PP even above market price would not be as favorable, IMO, as a non-Amark$p-10/19/2012
1312Yes good question - do they have to separate ore from each concession, keep closmarcos-10/19/2012
1311Agree: "Think there might be a PP eh, hmm they say no ... but then isn'Amark$p-10/19/2012
1310Thanks, Tad, much appreciated. Per your comments and my understanding (or lack Amark$p-10/19/2012
1309No amendment needed, pretty sure of that, Tad's post has the official scriptmarcos-10/19/2012
1308Amark$p, From what I can gather, these 5 licences take the place of Ecuador rapstad60410/19/2012
1307Thank you, that will be all.TheSlowLane710/19/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):